Elizabeth...no problem....I've used for a couple of years now and it has been a major timesaver.<br>
<br>
Re. the other questions:<br>
<br>
1) this only seems to work on the back end (data) db, not the front end. how come?<br>
<br>
Can you explain a little more about what you mean by the front-end please.<br>
<br>
2) the user shown is the machine name not the login name <br>
This seems a little strange I agree. If you examine the DLL there are 5 routines, only one of which is intended for calling by a developer seeking a user list. This function returns the machine name, when in fact if you view the ldb file (even in notepad) you will clearly see the username (Access username as opposed to OS login) listed along side the machine name. <br>
<br>
Whether the design is such that one assumes that by contacting the user at a particular machine one deals with all sessions of Access on that machine, irrespective of login details (thus a username list is arguably redundant), but I agree that what would be useful would be a machine name _and_ a username.<br>
<br>
Perhaps MS would care to comment....perhaps not as it is not officially supported.<br>
<br>
I notice that Michael Kaplan was involved with the design of the sample app, and for anyone who doesn't know, he can be found on the microsoft public newsgroups on a regular basis.<br>
<br>
Andrew<br>
<br>