RatherBeSkiing
IS-IT--Management
Hi,
I have a webserver on our internal network which has an external IP address forwarded to it as below.
static (inside,outside) 199.xxx.190.xxx 10.1.1.3 netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0
All is working fine externally, but I want internal users to be able to use the same web address as external users, so I looked at adding an alias line
alias (inside) 10.1.1.3 199.xxx.190.xxx 255.255.255.255
Am I correct in thinking that this doesn't work because I'm using an internal DNS server?
Can anyone help with an alternative setup, one suggestion I have had is to setup a DMZ with the following lines...
static (dmz,outside) 199.xxx.190.xxx 10.1.1.3 netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0
static (dmz,inside) 199.xxx.190.xxx 10.1.1.3 netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0
I think I can see the thought behind this but the PIX will not allow the second static command because of security levels.
Any suggestions greatly appreciated.
I have a webserver on our internal network which has an external IP address forwarded to it as below.
static (inside,outside) 199.xxx.190.xxx 10.1.1.3 netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0
All is working fine externally, but I want internal users to be able to use the same web address as external users, so I looked at adding an alias line
alias (inside) 10.1.1.3 199.xxx.190.xxx 255.255.255.255
Am I correct in thinking that this doesn't work because I'm using an internal DNS server?
Can anyone help with an alternative setup, one suggestion I have had is to setup a DMZ with the following lines...
static (dmz,outside) 199.xxx.190.xxx 10.1.1.3 netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0
static (dmz,inside) 199.xxx.190.xxx 10.1.1.3 netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0
I think I can see the thought behind this but the PIX will not allow the second static command because of security levels.
Any suggestions greatly appreciated.