Tek-Tips is the largest IT community on the Internet today!

Members share and learn making Tek-Tips Forums the best source of peer-reviewed technical information on the Internet!

  • Congratulations strongm on being selected by the Tek-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Format.com 1

Status
Not open for further replies.

seanbo

Programmer
Jun 6, 2003
407
GB
I'm doing a little research into the origins of some of the older parts of the ms operating systems. all windows machines, and dos machines before that, come with a program called format.com.

what was the first occurence of this program?
was is part of the famous deal between ms and the seattle computer company?
who wrote it? Was is Tim Paterson?
what is your earliest memory of this utility?

any information would be greatly recieved.


____________________________________________________
If you like a post, show you care by giving it a <censored>.
 
what was the first occurence of this program?
Windows - 1985 , v.1.01
was is part of the famous deal between ms and the seattle computer company?
IBM AND MS Made a joint OS, OS/2, MS backed out and made win3.1
who wrote it? Was is Tim Paterson?
DOS,QDOS,MSDOS, Apples DOS

More stuff go to loads on stuff there
 
Got my first PC in 1983, it was the third year of the IBM PC and was called IBM XT (model 5160) and I don't think DOS was at version 2 yet. Of course &quot;format.com&quot; was there and so was fdisk.exe to initialize the 10MB harddisk. Before using fdisk one had to run a bootstrap instruction c:\debug G=C800:5 which accessed a routine in BIOS.
IBM PC, model 5150 was released in September 1981 and had a 160KB 5.25-inch disk drive, the OS was IBM PC-DOS Version 1.0 and format.com had to be there as floppies were not pre-formatted and there was no BIOS routine
to do it.
In 1983 I had already been working with mini computers for 4 years and thought PCs would never amount to anything, go figure. Cheers, hexmex.
 
would i be right to say that ibm pc-dos and ms-dos were created together by ms and ibm - both being basicly the same thing, but marketed differently? was 1981 the year each of these were first released? did they both have format.com?

btw - i thought PCs would never amount to anything iether. i was using a bbc micro during the 80s

____________________________________________________
If you like a post, show you care by giving it a <censored>.
 
Format was in the original release to support the floppy disk drive option. Floppy disks were optional, you could purchase the machine with just a cassette port to load BASIC programs.

DOS stands for &quot;Disk Operating System&quot; to reflect this was to be used with the floppy disks, and the software was an option.

Tim Paterson's &quot;Quick-and-Dirty DOS 1.0 was approximately 4000 lines of assembler source. It did not have a format utility. Format.com was not written until the BIOS int 13h routines were standardized by IBM. You could format a disk fairly easily calling the drive controller directly.

From: Antov's brief history of MS-DOS

&quot;This code (Paterson's) was quickly polished up and presented to IBM for evaluation. IBM found itself left with Microsoft's offering of &quot;Microsoft Disk Operating System 1.0&quot;. An agreement was reached between the two, and IBM agreed to accept 86-DOS as the main operating system for their new PC. Microsoft purchased all rights to 86-DOS in July 1981, and &quot;IBM Personal Computer DOS 1.0&quot; was ready for the introduction of the IBM PC in October 1981. IBM subjected the operating system to an extensive quality-assurance program, reportedly found well over 300 bugs, and decided to rewrite the programs. This is why PC-DOS is copyrighted by both IBM and Microsoft.

It is sometimes amusing to reflect on the fact that the IBM PC was not originally intended to run MS-DOS. The target operating system at the end of the development was for a (not yet in existence) 8086 version of CP/M. On the other hand, when DOS was originally written the IBM PC did not yet exist! Although PC-DOS was bundled with the computer, Digital Research's CP/M-86 would probably have been the main operating system for the PC except for two things - Digital Research wanted $495 for CP/M-86 (considering PC-DOS was essentially free) and many software developers found it easier to port existing CP/M software to DOS than to the new version of CP/M. The IBM PC shipped without an operating system.

IBM didn't start bundling DOS until the second generation AT/339 came out. You could order one of three operating systems for your PC, assuming you popped for the optional disk drive and 64k RAM upgrade (base models had 16k and a cassette player port). These operating systems were IBM Personal Computer DOS 1.0, a version of the UCSD p-System, which was an integrated Pascal operating system something like the souped-up BASIC operating systems used by the Commodore 64 and others, or Digital Research's CP/M-86, which was officially an option although you couldn't buy it until later. Since IBM's $39.95 DOS was far cheaper than anyone else's alternative, darned near everyone bought DOS.

Microsoft Press' &quot;MSDOS Encyclopedia&quot; shows a reproduction of a late DOS 1.25 OEM brochure. Microsoft was touting future enhancements to 1.25 including Xenix-compatible pipes, process forks, and multitasking, as well as &quot;graphics and cursor positioning, kanji support, multi-user and hard disk support, and networking.&quot; Microsoft certainly thought big, but, alas, the forks, multitasking, and multiuser support never came about, at least in US versions of DOS. Oddly, the flyer claims:

&quot;MS-DOS has no practical limit on disk size. MS-DOS uses 4-byte XENIX OS compatible pointers for file and disk capacity up to 4 gigabytes.&quot;

 
nice one mr castner, cheers. am i to understand that format.com was written as part of the major program re-write that took place after qa reportedly found over 300 bugs?

in which case, i guess it's all microsoft's work. it would still be nice to know the actual programmer.


most liekly suspects:

steve wood
bob wallace
jim lane
bob o'rear
bob greenberg
marc mcdonald
gordon letwin
andrea lewis
maria wood
paul allen -and, of course-
bill gates

these people accounted for most of microsofts actions at the time. they probably weren't all programmers. any further information regarding them, or format.com would be most apreciated.

____________________________________________________
If you like a post, show you care by giving it a <censored>.
 
I would have guessed Tim Paterson himself. After MS bought the program from Seattle Computer Products Paterson went to work for Microsoft.

Paterson worked for Microsoft from May 1981 to April 1982. After a brief second stint with SCP, Paterson started his own company, Falcon Technology, which was bought by Microsoft in 1986. Paterson did a second stint with Microsoft from 1986-1988 and a third stint from 1990-1998. During his third stint at Microsoft, he worked on Visual Basic and Microsoft's version of Java.

You may find your answer with one of these links:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor

Back
Top