I have a section that have 2 fields. the secodn fileds is suppres by formula. Problem is when this field is suppressed, then section don't fit itself - can i do somthing with this? I need to fit this section when the bottom filed is not displayed.
Are you wanting the section at the bottom of the page? That is a section option, and can be made conditional. The opposite of whatever it is that suppresses the field.
Right-click on a section and choose Section Expert. Then choose the formula icon (x+2 and a pencil)
Madawc Williams (East Anglia, UK)
Windows XP & Crystal 10
OK, I try describe my problem once again. I have a report with column layout and one section (in the middle of the report) with 3 fileds on it. Left column have one field, right column 2 fields. Now, I suppres the bottom field by formula and then section don't decrease their vertical size, thereby my report have a blank space instead of (suppresed)field. The problem is: how resize section (decrase width) when field is suppresed.
I can't move this field to another section and suppres this section when field isn't display, because, my column layout don't permit to do this.
In the Section Expert - there is a option box entitled "Suppress Blank Section" - tick this on and when the fields return no data in the section - it will suppress.
It is also good practice to put these 3 fields in a subsection of its own. How do you do this? Put your pointer in the left hand gray margin and right click. Choose Insert section below - then drag the 3 fields into that subsection - it will be labelled for instance - Group 1a Group 1b. Put the fields in Group 1b and then in the Section Expert tick on the "Suppress Blank Section".
Almost good, but my report have a column layout and I can't put 2 subsections in some cases. For example my report look like this:
----------------------------
AAAAAAA BBBBBBB Section A
AAAAAAA CCCCCCC
----------------------------
DDDDDDD EEEEEEE Section B
----------------------------
Field AAAAAAA can grow, and field CCCCCC (if isn't suppresed by formula) must bu exaclly under field BBBBBBB. When I put a section between A and B (for example 1A) and put field CCCCCCC into this section my report look like:
----------------------------
AAAAAAA BBBBBBB Section A
AAAAAAA
----------------------------
CCCCCCC Section 1A
----------------------------
DDDDDDD EEEEEEE Section B
----------------------------
and I have a blank space between field BBBBBBB and CCCCCCC.
I think about formula field that return field BBBBBB concatenated with CCCCCCC (if needed) and put this field with AAAAAAA into one section - what do you think about this? This situation is very offen in my report. How affect number of formula fields on report performance?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.