Tek-Tips is the largest IT community on the Internet today!

Members share and learn making Tek-Tips Forums the best source of peer-reviewed technical information on the Internet!

  • Congratulations Chris Miller on being selected by the Tek-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Exchange 2007 32 Bit on Windows 2003 Standard Server

Status
Not open for further replies.

skipzoid

Technical User
Mar 9, 2013
2
GB
Hello All.
Apologies if this is the wrong area.

We are a very small new company struggling to start-up and get going, we've only been running for a few months and money for the moment is tight.

we decided for the sake of ease to spend some money on equipment. Having bought four new laptops each with windows 2013 on just a couple of months ago, we couldn't afford a brand new top of the line server and having spoken to a local I.T company they offered us a second hand Windows 2003 Standard Edition 64Bit Server and Exchange 2003. Which on the face of it for sharing files and low levels of email and users seemed like a good deal.

Well to cut a long story short, nothing really worked too well and having realised these guys have taken us for a ride we kicked them into touch, the email has always been a problem and never worked properly, we've never gotten the calender or contacts to work.

Looking at the problem and doing a little of our own research is seems our problem is that office 2013 needs Exchange 2007 as a minimum ? But we have Exchange 2003. (You'd think the I.T company would have sussed that)
We are quoting for a contract at the moment and if that comes off and its looking good, we'll have some funds to spend, so the question is having done a little research, if we where to install the Windows 2007 32bit now and run that for a short while, would it cope with four users until we can afford in a few months to invest in a new server ? According to what we have read, it would be unsupported and isn't recommended for a production environment but does that mean it will not work ?. Would it cope with just four users being ; four laptops and four HTC mobile phones using email ?

 
Honestly, if I were you, and money was tight, I would go with hosted Exchange (Office 365). Then you'd be fully supported on Exchange 2013 and wouldn't have to deal with the costs of labor and licensing to get there. Then you could continue using your existing server as a decent file server, which I'm sure it would have no trouble doing fine as.

A 32-bit Exchange 2007 would work, but I wouldn't bother.

Dave Shackelford
ThirdTier.net
TrainSignal.com
 
I can't help but agree with ShackDaddy... you have a four mailbox Exchange server? No way is that cost effective unless you're running SBS (which you don't seem to be). Migrate to a hosted platform--you are the perfect candidate organization. After you double in size four or five times, then maybe you can look at bringing things back to a premise solution.

If, for some reason this doesn't work for you, I can't help but ask: why would you run 32-bit Exchange at all? You describe the Win2k3 box as 64-bit, so run 64-bit Exchange on it. If your concern is migration, then p2v the existing server, spin it up wherever, reimage the server, install e2k7, migrate all your mailboxes, decommission the e2k3 VM, and call it a day. With an environment your size, we're not talking about a lot of work.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor

Back
Top