Actually, I was wrong. It is 4 GB which Exchange can effectively utilize. Here is the detailed explanation by Evan Dodds – a technical lead in the MS Exchange admin group:
• “Our next question is: I'm running Windows Server 2003 Enterprise Edition with Exchange 2003, and I have 5 GB of RAM in my server. Is this a waste, or are there any switches besides the /3gb /Userva=3030 switch that can help utilize this extra RAM? I only see references to machines that have 4 GB of RAM and no more.
Evan: Because of the way Exchange uses memory, there is generally no benefit to having more than 4 GB of RAM inside your server. If you're running other applications on the server apart from Exchange, you may find that there is some benefit to doing it. But if you have a dedicated Exchange server, generally 4 GB of RAM will get you the best performance. Do you know anything additional that he could do, Nino?
Nino: No. I'm not aware of anything else. I believe that's correct. It's really the limitation of how Exchange is designed. It's just that the design of the product will not let us address more. At this point, 4 GB is really all that you need. However, as Evan mentioned, some other applications that are running on the server, if there are other applications, might benefit from it.”
• By other purposes I meant running other applications on the Exchange server.
• I’ve never met the term “wasting time territory” and I would appreciate if Zelandakh elaborates on it – it sounds interesting.
Dean
Dean