Has anyone experiences with the troughput of e.g. 4 gigabit adapters put together to an etherchannel? Is the bandwith really 4 times faster or is there a loss because of overhead for e.g. the load balancing?
Etherchannel does not create a bigger pipe for you. It just provides adapter redundancy. Your throughput with 4 gigabit adapters in an etherchannel should be roughly the same as with 1 gigabit adapter alone.
thanx for your fast answer...
Are you sure???
If yes then i understood something completely wrong in the documentation about it:
"The main benefit of EtherChannel and IEEE 802.3ad Link Aggregation is that they have the network bandwidth of all of their adapters in a single network presence."
Link:
Yes, I am sure. Only 1 adapter is used at a time. The load will get spread across all of the adapters in the etherchannel, but not in parallel. There are a few diff algorithms you can choose to determine exactly how the load will get spread. Also make sure your switch is capable of handling the etherchannel config.
Jim is right. etherchannel is typically run in a "fail_over mode". You could look into aggregating the adapter(s). I've never done it, but have seem posts on here about it.
What I've read about it is you can have etherchannel configured as fail-over and as link-aggregation. Not sure, but I believe you can have both at the same time also (e.g. 3 adapters link-aggregated and one extra adapter in standby). You do need a network switch that is configured for this.
When my network collegues have time i would try it on my tsm server. I have two gigabit adapters in it and they are attached to a cisco enviroment. I would see it myself now Thanx you for your informations about it.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.