Tek-Tips is the largest IT community on the Internet today!

Members share and learn making Tek-Tips Forums the best source of peer-reviewed technical information on the Internet!

  • Congratulations SkipVought on being selected by the Tek-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

eigrp redistribute question 2

Status
Not open for further replies.

iwanthome

Technical User
Mar 9, 2003
45
0
0
CN
My network is 3640,7500 and four 6509 msfc interconnected with ethernet vlan 200,like this:
6509 msfc(10.1.200.250)----vlan 200----3640(10.1.200.246)
6509 msfc(10.1.200.251)----vlan 200----7500(10.1.200.248)
6509 msfc(10.1.200.252)----vlan 200
6509 msfc(10.1.200.254)----vlan 200
I have a eigrp's problem.Two external route are changed frequently on cisco router 7500.The two external router
is redistributed on 6509 msfc,and it stays long on 3640.When I show ip eigrp events on one of four msfcs,I can
see "14:16:32.177 Poison squashed: 10.88.254.1/32 reverse" and " 14:16:32.177 Poison squashed: 0.0.0.0/0
reverse".I think maybe it is the reason.But I am in doubt why 3640 is work ok. Can anybody point me how to
troubleshooting this? When and why 6509 msfc "Poison squashed: 10.88.254.1/32 reverse" ? Why 7500's routing table
is changed and 3640 is not?
thanks !
any comment is appreciated!

3640#sh ip route
D EX 10.88.254.1/32 [170/281600] via 10.1.200.254, 1d05h, Ethernet0/0
[170/281600] via 10.1.200.251, 1d05h, Ethernet0/0
[170/281600] via 10.1.200.250, 1d05h, Ethernet0/0
[170/281600] via 10.1.200.252, 1d05h, Ethernet0/0
D*EX 0.0.0.0/0 [170/281600] via 10.1.200.254, 1d05h, Ethernet0/0
[170/281600] via 10.1.200.251, 1d05h, Ethernet0/0
[170/281600] via 10.1.200.250, 1d05h, Ethernet0/0
[170/281600] via 10.1.200.252, 1d05h, Ethernet0/0
3640>sh ip eigrp nei
IP-EIGRP neighbors for process 1
H Address Interface Hold Uptime SRTT RTO Q Seq
(sec) (ms) Cnt Num
0 10.1.200.248 Et0/0 13 1w2d 20 450 0 282759
9 10.1.200.252 Et0/0 11 1w2d 16 450 0 10937
8 10.1.200.254 Et0/0 14 1w2d 17 450 0 10932
4 10.1.200.250 Et0/0 12 1w2d 17 450 0 10988
2 10.1.200.251 Et0/0 14 1w2d 19 450 0 10987

7500#sh ip route
D EX 10.88.254.1/32
[170/28160] via 10.1.200.252, 01:13:07, FastEthernet1/1/0
[170/28160] via 10.1.200.250, 01:13:07, FastEthernet1/1/0
[170/28160] via 10.1.200.254, 01:13:07, FastEthernet1/1/0
[170/28160] via 10.1.200.251, 01:13:07, FastEthernet1/1/0
D*EX 0.0.0.0/0 [170/28160] via 10.1.200.252, 01:13:18, FastEthernet1/1/0
[170/28160] via 10.1.200.250, 01:13:18, FastEthernet1/1/0
[170/28160] via 10.1.200.254, 01:13:18, FastEthernet1/1/0
[170/28160] via 10.1.200.251, 01:13:18, FastEthernet1/1/0
7500#sh ip eigrp nei
IP-EIGRP neighbors for process 1
H Address Interface Hold Uptime SRTT RTO Q Seq Type
(sec) (ms) Cnt Num
31 10.1.200.251 Fa1/1/0 13 1w2d 1 300 0 10991
29 10.1.200.250 Fa1/1/0 11 1w2d 1 300 0 10992
28 10.1.200.254 Fa1/1/0 13 1w2d 1 300 0 10936
27 10.1.200.252 Fa1/1/0 14 1w2d 1 300 0 10941
25 10.1.200.246 Fa1/1/0 12 1w2d 1 300 0 34149


6509_1#sh ip route
S 10.88.254.1/32 [1/0] via 10.0.8.3
S* 0.0.0.0/0 [1/0] via 10.1.100.248
6509_1>sh ip eigrp nei
IP-EIGRP neighbors for process 1
H Address Interface Hold Uptime SRTT RTO Q Seq Type
(sec) (ms) Cnt Num
5 10.1.200.248 Vl200 11 1w2d 44 594 0 282759
1 10.1.200.246 Vl200 13 1w2d 11 450 0 34145
8 10.1.200.252 Vl200 13 1w2d 8 1012 0 10937
7 10.1.200.254 Vl200 12 1w2d 25 1012 0 10932
9 10.1.200.251 Vl200 13 1w2d 8 1012 0 10937


6509_1>sh ip eigrp events
Event information for AS 18:
1 14:16:32.257 Poison squashed: 10.76.0.0/14 reverse
2 14:16:32.241 Change queue emptied, entries: 1
3 14:16:32.241 Metric set: 10.76.0.0/14 1807360
4 14:16:32.241 Update reason, delay: metric chg 517120
5 14:16:32.241 Update sent, RD: 10.76.0.0/14 1807872
6 14:16:32.241 Route install: 10.76.0.0/14 10.1.200.248
7 14:16:32.241 Route install: 10.76.0.0/14 10.1.200.245
8 14:16:32.241 FC sat rdbmet/succmet: 1807360 1804800
9 14:16:32.241 FC sat nh/ndbmet: 10.1.200.248 1807872
10 14:16:32.241 Find FS: 10.76.0.0/14 1807360
11 14:16:32.241 Rcv update met/succmet: 1807360 1804800
12 14:16:32.241 Rcv update dest/nh: 10.76.0.0/14 10.1.200.248
13 14:16:32.177 Poison squashed: 10.88.254.1/32 reverse
14 14:16:32.177 Poison squashed: 0.0.0.0/0 reverse
15 14:16:32.177 Poison squashed: 10.0.224.0/19 reverse
16 14:16:27.329 Poison squashed: 10.76.0.0/14 reverse
17 14:16:27.225 RDB delete: 10.76.0.0/14 10.1.200.248
18 14:16:27.201 Poison squashed: 10.76.0.0/14 reverse
19 14:16:27.173 Change queue emptied, entries: 1
20 14:16:27.173 Metric set: 10.76.0.0/14 1807872
21 14:16:27.173 Update reason, delay: metric chg 517120
22 14:16:27.173 Update sent, RD: 10.76.0.0/14 1807360
23 14:16:27.173 Route install: 10.76.0.0/14 10.1.200.245
24 14:16:27.173 Send reply: 10.76.0.0/14 10.1.200.248
25 14:16:27.173 FC sat rdbmet/succmet: 1807872 1805312
26 14:16:27.173 FC sat nh/ndbmet: 10.1.200.245 1807360
27 14:16:27.173 Find FS: 10.76.0.0/14 1807360
28 14:16:27.173 Rcv query met/succ met: 4294967295 4294967295
29 14:16:27.173 Rcv query dest/nh: 10.76.0.0/14 10.1.200.248
 
Would you, please, set the "debug eigrp packets" for both the 6509_1 switch and the 7500 router? Also, could you set the debug eigrp neighbors for the 7500 router?
 
I'm with fmonteiro on this, show an output of those debug options. I will say first thought is posion reverse isn't allowing some of your updates from the MSFC to the 7500. It is basically saying I received update from this interface already, poison reverse dictates I cannot send route changes out the interface because I may be sending faulty information. But I can't be 100% sure until I see what is happening from the debugs.
 
I'm so sorry,I can't debug on 6509 or 7500 because they have about 40 eigrp neighbors and they are our procuction enviorement.
I can use all show command if you need.
please help me! thanks!
 
Could you, at least, get a debug ip eigrp notifications for the 7500 ( I am not expecting a hugh output from this command but do it after hours). If this is not possible post a sh ip eigrp events for the 7500.
 
I looked at this again and think I noticed something I missed before:

Route install: 10.76.0.0/14 10.1.200.245

Where is this route update coming from you don't have this listed anywhere as a router or MSFC. Want to know where 245 is; I think what could be happening here is poison reverse is causing an update error due to mis-configured gateway of last resort on the 6509 or the 7500. It is deleting the route from the routing data base-
17 14:16:27.225 RDB delete: 10.76.0.0/14 10.1.200.248

Look at it from the start, well sort of the start. An update is happening.
3 14:16:32.241 Metric set: 10.76.0.0/14 1807360
4 14:16:32.241 Update reason, delay: metric chg 517120

The routes are being installed.
6 14:16:32.241 Route install: 10.76.0.0/14 10.1.200.248
7 14:16:32.241 Route install: 10.76.0.0/14 10.1.200.245


8 14:16:32.241 FC sat rdbmet/succmet: 1807360 1804800
9 14:16:32.241 FC sat nh/ndbmet: 10.1.200.248 1807872

Searching for Feasible Successor
10 14:16:32.241 Find FS: 10.76.0.0/14 1807360

Receiving Updates
11 14:16:32.241 Rcv update met/succmet: 1807360 1804800
12 14:16:32.241 Rcv update dest/nh: 10.76.0.0/14 10.1.200.248

Poison Reverse stopping updates.
13 14:16:32.177 Poison squashed: 10.88.254.1/32 reverse
14 14:16:32.177 Poison squashed: 0.0.0.0/0 reverse
15 14:16:32.177 Poison squashed: 10.0.224.0/19 reverse
16 14:16:27.329 Poison squashed: 10.76.0.0/14 reverse

MSFC Deleting Route because an update could not be received.

17 14:16:27.225 RDB delete: 10.76.0.0/14 10.1.200.248

(which makes me wonder if you aren't seeing any SIA errors somewhere?)


again it would be more helpful if I could see the 7500's eigrp events to see if what I'm thinking is correct, I could be totaly wrong.






 
I investigate this for these two days.Maybe I found the reason.MY topu is actually like this:
6509 msfc(10.1.200.250)-vlan 200-3640(10.1.200.246)-wan 1--r1
6509 msfc(10.1.200.251)-vlan 200-7500(10.1.200.248)-wan 2--r1
6509 msfc(10.1.200.252)-vlan 200
6509 msfc(10.1.200.254)-vlan 200
I think the flowchart is like this:
1. wan 2 is down
2. wan 2 is up
3. r1 will build eigrp neighbor with 7500,and send update to 7500.
4. 7500 receive update and begin DUAL.because r1 is not successor of 7500 except 10.76.0.0(suppose this),so DUAL is local-compution,and 7500 will not send update to other except 10.76.0.0.
5. 7500 will reset sh ip route timeclock,so when I show ip route,all route 's uptime will change frequently because my wan is not stablity.And I show ip eigrp nei,I found there is one neighbor's uptime is same as sh ip route uptime.
So I think this is the reason.and I found this on routing tcp/ip vol 1 p 207:
A router will reassess its list of feasible successors for a route, as described in the last section, any time an
input event occurs. An input event can be:
A change in the cost of a directly connected link
A change in the state (up or down) of a directly connected link
The reception of an update packet---->this is the reason?
The reception of a query packet
The reception of a reply packet

English is not my native language,so I can't express exactly what I think.

thanks!

 
something I forget:
I sh log on 7500,I can found wan 2 is down and up,and the time is approved my suppose.
 
You got it! Congratulations!
Is the wan2 flapping? Perhaps you should further investigate what is happening!
 
thanks for your two guys help!
And wan2 flapping is out control of me. I will report it to ISP.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor

Back
Top