If you're like me, when you first learned to type, you were told to always place two spaces after the end of a sentence, i.e. "See Dick run. See Jane run."
This rule was established in the days of non-proportional typesetting, such as you might see on a typewriter. So the space taken up on the page by the character "i" was the same amount of space taken up by the character "M." With each character, including a "space," taking up the same amount of space, it was considered to be difficult for the human eye to easily pick up the beginning of a new sentence when there was only one space. Hence, the double-space.
However, modern word processors and word-processing software include proportional typesetting, meaning that "i" is a lot thinner than "M." So, it is argued that the double-space is no longer necessary because the human eye is able to catch those single spaces,indicating a new sentence, a lot easier.
This is a huge debate in a lot of academic circles and impassioned editors are often vehement in their denouncement of double-spaces (notice the typesetting in newspapers or magazines. But there are a lot of people who are so used to using the double-space that they simply will not make the effort to start using a single (despite the reduction in overall keystrokes).
What do you think?
This rule was established in the days of non-proportional typesetting, such as you might see on a typewriter. So the space taken up on the page by the character "i" was the same amount of space taken up by the character "M." With each character, including a "space," taking up the same amount of space, it was considered to be difficult for the human eye to easily pick up the beginning of a new sentence when there was only one space. Hence, the double-space.
However, modern word processors and word-processing software include proportional typesetting, meaning that "i" is a lot thinner than "M." So, it is argued that the double-space is no longer necessary because the human eye is able to catch those single spaces,indicating a new sentence, a lot easier.
This is a huge debate in a lot of academic circles and impassioned editors are often vehement in their denouncement of double-spaces (notice the typesetting in newspapers or magazines. But there are a lot of people who are so used to using the double-space that they simply will not make the effort to start using a single (despite the reduction in overall keystrokes).
What do you think?