Until they provide us with count(distinct [fieldname]), then in Access 97 at any rate, your best bet might honestly be to split it up into two queries - the first selecting the distinct values and the second using the first as a source.
An inelegant solution, but it would get you moving along...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.