ShoKashuki
MIS
Better way to discribe this is:
I would like to create a scope that has reservations in it. The devices that will pickup these reserved addresses need to point to different resources than the other devices in the current scope. Is there a way to force these reserved clients into a second scope that populates TCP/IP settings with slightly different settings.
I was thinking creating a superscope and encapsulating 2 scopes w/different scope options. Will the devices on the network see the superscope as one and follow the reservations defined by one of the scopes? Or will they just pickup the first address and the heck with reservations?
Example:
Network A: 192.168.0.xxx SNM: 255.255.254.0
None reserved machines get:
Gateway: x.x.x.1
DNS: x.x.x.2
ftp: x.x.x.3
Reserved machines get:
Gateway: x.x.x.1
DNS: x.x.x.2
ftp: x.x.x.100
The reserved machines are Wyse Winterm thin clients and pointing them to a differnet ftp server assures they get the right screen for their function.
Thanks
I would like to create a scope that has reservations in it. The devices that will pickup these reserved addresses need to point to different resources than the other devices in the current scope. Is there a way to force these reserved clients into a second scope that populates TCP/IP settings with slightly different settings.
I was thinking creating a superscope and encapsulating 2 scopes w/different scope options. Will the devices on the network see the superscope as one and follow the reservations defined by one of the scopes? Or will they just pickup the first address and the heck with reservations?
Example:
Network A: 192.168.0.xxx SNM: 255.255.254.0
None reserved machines get:
Gateway: x.x.x.1
DNS: x.x.x.2
ftp: x.x.x.3
Reserved machines get:
Gateway: x.x.x.1
DNS: x.x.x.2
ftp: x.x.x.100
The reserved machines are Wyse Winterm thin clients and pointing them to a differnet ftp server assures they get the right screen for their function.
Thanks