Tek-Tips is the largest IT community on the Internet today!

Members share and learn making Tek-Tips Forums the best source of peer-reviewed technical information on the Internet!

  • Congratulations Mike Lewis on being selected by the Tek-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Defragmenting

Status
Not open for further replies.

NewAdm

IS-IT--Management
Aug 6, 2007
24
US
Has anyone had experience with defragmenting a magnetic library? My gut instinct says not to, but I'd like to confirm.
 
Commvault tried to blame my AUX copy chunk errors on a fragmented magnetic library when I first started using the software almost 3 years ago. I figure it this way - you never have to take a primary storage array "offline" to defrag it, so this didn't quite cut it with me. Granted, most storage vendors have a defrag or scrub utility but, quite frankly, I've had little to no success with windows defrag or any other 3rd party product. Now I'm talking about 2 TB volumes, not a few gigs or even a few hundred gigs. With just little activity on my volumes, I let defrag run for days and days and it never finished. In the end Commvault released a patch that fixed it like I knew they would - just have to beat it out of them at times. Now to answer your question - there is no harm in defragging a magnetic library, but is there a specific reason to? I've seen no speed or throughput degradation to my backup storage arrays that can be attributed to fragmentation. With all of the read/writes as a result of backups and aux copies, even if I could defrag it would do little to no good I think.

Hope this helps.
 
We have a 2.5 TB volume that is pretty fragmented (according to diskkeeper.) I just want to keep things as efficient as possible.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor

Back
Top