It's not often that a writer manages to create something totally new & different, but I believe this man may have succeeded I'm quite tempted to get a copy.
"Your rock is eroding wrong." -Dogbert
"Your rock is eroding wrong." -Dogbert
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
IMHO, "W" used as a vowel is a bit of a "cheat" since both words in the "English" language that use "w" as a vowel are both Welsh (as our friend Fee can attest):Sleipnir said:What happened to "w"?
I don't believe that the example you offered for "W" working as a consonant because we "can hear the..."W" as a consonant, will fly...If you divide "coward" into syllables, it is "cow-ard". The first syllable, "cow" is the same pronunciation that you used in your example to "prove" that "w" is a vowel; the second syllable, "ard" is pronounced just that way..."ard". If "w" were to become part of the second syllable (so that you could "hear" it as a "w", then the syllabic division would become "co-ward", thus taking on a pronunciation similar to the initial sounds of "co-worker".Sleipnir said:But in "coward" you can hear the word "W" working as a consonant.
From my perspective, I'd label it as silent, not a vowel.However, if we're talking about a piece archer's equipment, the 'w' is a vowel.
Perhaps you'd care to shed some light as to what disqualifies Cecil Adams as a legitimate scholarly resource. I would think that since The Straight Dope has been been published for some 35 years (long before websites came to be), and currently syndicated in over 30 newspapers throughout the country speaks rather favorably to this source.Can you offer more scholarly justification for "w" as a vowel than that offered by "Straight, Dopey Dipthong, Cecil?" Just because a guy can afford to pay for an Internet Website (as Cecil did), is not enough reason to accept his blogging as Gospel. <grin>
Cajun, didn't you see my <grin>?CC said:Perhaps you'd care to shed some light as to what disqualifies Cecil Adams as a legitimate scholarly resource.
I agree. However, I don't believe that being silent is enough to qualify the 'W' as a vowel.I don't believe that whether or not letter is silent or sounded has no bearing on whether it's a vowel or consonant.
I hope that such is a reasonable thing to do. I, in no way, want to come across as contrary, but I am eager to learn new linguistic concepts whenever available. Additional testimonials of a new concepts, I believe, strengthen the basis for accepting a new concept.CC said:...you frequently challenge cited sources when you take issue with the point being presented...