Tek-Tips is the largest IT community on the Internet today!

Members share and learn making Tek-Tips Forums the best source of peer-reviewed technical information on the Internet!

  • Congratulations strongm on being selected by the Tek-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Citrix Metaframe XPA FR3, Load Managers

Status
Not open for further replies.

EvilPeppard

IS-IT--Management
Oct 14, 2002
73
US
I am using the built-in Advanced Load Evaluator. Is that the best to use, or should I configure a new one, and if so, what should the criteria be?

These servers currenly host about 160 concurrent sessions and I regularly get users complaining of screen latency. The server Load Monitor shows the servers all run at about 16% - 20% on average throughout the day, with occasional spikes. I have Speed Screen turned on for all the clients.

Any advice would really be appreciated. I will supply more information if needed. Thanks.
alarm.gif
 
How many servers you got and how many processors per server have you got.

Advanced load manager is best for single procs and default is best for multi procs, I believe.

Check the NIC's are hard set to LAN speeds and the chck processor queues.

Cheers
Scott
 
Well, I would like some concrete info, if at all possible.

I have 8 servers, all with 2GB RAM. 2 servers are dual 1GHZ, the rest are dual Xeon 2GHZ or higher.

I am running advanced Load Evaluators on all the servers now.
alarm.gif
 
Sorry if I was a bit vague its 9:30pm here!

As a rough rule of thumb

20 users per proc therfore you should have 8 processors minimum.

You have 16 which should eat it. Good load balanced environment.

You can set the NIC's to run at e.g 100Mb full duplex etc
or at auto detect. I would run them at the speed of your own network therfore they do not negotiate each packet onto the LAN.

As an extra thought when were they last re-booted ?
Memory leaks etc?

Can you isolate the users to a specific machine when this problem occurs.

Did I note that on another discussion you quoted 65 apps on the servers or was that someone else ?



Cheers
Scott
 
I'm actually not having any problems, I just want to make sure I have my load evaluators set correctly. I currently am using the Advanced ones. Is that the best to use or is there a better configuration.

Also, I have only set the load evaluators on the servers, not on any applications. Do I need to set load evaluators on applications as well?
alarm.gif
 
>>These servers currenly host about 160 concurrent sessions and I regularly get users complaining of screen latency. The server Load Monitor shows the servers all run at about 16% - 20% on average throughout the day, with occasional spikes. I have Speed Screen turned on for all the clients.>>


Sorry I was replying to this bit.

I would say that the advanced load evaluator on server is the way to go. If you start going as low as app level then you are over complicating matters. I answered a thread earlier this evening saying that I have never had to touch the load evaluators, I like keeping it simple. If your boxes perform the same then its working.

Cheers
Scott
 
Great, thanks. When I read about applying the load evaluators to applications, I thought I had a major oversight. I have all the servers set with the Advanced Load Evaluator.

I'm not sure why some users get the latency sometimes, but I guess there isn't much I can do until I add more servers.

Thanks again.
alarm.gif
 
I would have said you have sufficient servers just now!!

Lets say you lost one (i know big things are difficult to lose)

Thats 160 users spread over 7 servers. By rights you would still require 8 processors to service them so your 14 remaining should still happily ahem service them. Your crunch point comes if you lose 2 or 3 how remiss.


Cheers
Scott
 
Thanks again for the help. Sounds like I have the farm setup adequately.
alarm.gif
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor

Back
Top