Cisco ip route 1

[matthias7]

Hi

I made the VPN configuration betwen Cisco 850 and linksys WRV210 and i forget to add the access-list 101 to the configuration and the WRV210 went unresponsive(hade to recycle linksys to get it up and running plus dissable thje VPN), is that normal ???

now the real question is when i applied ...

access-list 101 permit ip 172.16.x.0 0.0.0.255 172.16.x2.0 0.0.0.255

i see traffic comming in from linksys but not reaching their destination and back and i can not send anything over the VPN cisco side ... does it mean that i need ip route since my crypto map is connected to FE4 ...

i can se that i have pkts decaps, decrypt ... but nothing in "pkts encaps and so on" and when i use traceroute i see that the local ip address on the other end of the VPN tunnel, it send the data out to the internet instead out on the VPN tunnel from cisco 850 ...


Mat

 

[unclerico]

absolutely. glad you got it to work.

I hate all Uppercase... I don't want my groups to seem angry at me all the time! =)
- ColdFlame (vbscript forum)