Don't use a 2600 series router for routing at 100mb. Use a layer3 switch like the Cisco Catalyst 3550. They can be a little pricy, but can do wire speed layer3. The 2600 series routers will come nowhere near that speed.
The issue is that we recently upgraded to a 100Mbps fiber option line with a new ISP, only we also have a router on the LAN that just redirects traffic either down our VPN tunnels or out onto the Internet. That router is a Cisco 765 with a 10Mbps Ethernet interface - seen as everything else is running at 100Mbps that router is a big bottleneck.
If you can afford a 100Mbps fiber optic line to your ISP, how exactly can you not have the money to buy an expensive router? Sounds like the cost of that connection would by far eclipse the cost of any router you might want to put on it. Of course none of the given suggestions are really that expensive anyways, unless on a shoestring budget. (and even then, not expensive if bought second-hand)
Do you need to terminate the fiber into the router, or is it an ethernet connection? Is this wireless or an interbuilding company reselling bandwidth?
If what you are saying is true about getting a 100mbit Internet connction, then you are talking about some serious bandwidth. Even two DS3's bonded together don't equal that.
In order to handle the load (assuming you will be using at least 50% of your bandwidth), you'll need to have at least a Cisco 7200 series router. If your connection is ethernet, you can get by with a relatively cheap Cisco 3550 layer3 switch. Basic Layer3 versions are around $2000 USD.
If all your using the router for is as a default gateway that redirects and doesn't pass anything through it, my thought is a 1700 series. You can pick up a used one for a few hundred bucks.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.