There are three offices at work, each containing 5-6 stand alone PC's. I want to create a client/server network - the server will be located in a fourth office.
As far as I can tell, there are two ways I could run the cabling in this system...
(1) Run a cable from every individual computer to a hub/switch in the fourth (server) office.
(2) Have a hub in each office, connect the computers in that office to it and then run one cable from each office hub to a switch in the fourth (server) office.
I can see advantages / disadvantages of both methods...
(1 - costs more for the cabling, but all equipment would be located in one office for administration purposes, 2 - costs less for cabling, but each hub is located in a seperate office). Can anyone share with me any practical reasons why I should choose one method over another? Or indeed, am I missing anything blatantly obvious?? {The offices are ~20 metres from each other, if that should make any difference to the solution)
Many thanks.
As far as I can tell, there are two ways I could run the cabling in this system...
(1) Run a cable from every individual computer to a hub/switch in the fourth (server) office.
(2) Have a hub in each office, connect the computers in that office to it and then run one cable from each office hub to a switch in the fourth (server) office.
I can see advantages / disadvantages of both methods...
(1 - costs more for the cabling, but all equipment would be located in one office for administration purposes, 2 - costs less for cabling, but each hub is located in a seperate office). Can anyone share with me any practical reasons why I should choose one method over another? Or indeed, am I missing anything blatantly obvious?? {The offices are ~20 metres from each other, if that should make any difference to the solution)
Many thanks.