Oct 31, 2005 #1 Letreen IS-IT--Management May 15, 2003 7 US I am trying to use the default "Unix standard directives" which includes << /tmp >> skip: * .?* but is seems like I am still getting backups of the /tmp directories on all my unix hosts. Any suggestions as to what can be causing the problem.
I am trying to use the default "Unix standard directives" which includes << /tmp >> skip: * .?* but is seems like I am still getting backups of the /tmp directories on all my unix hosts. Any suggestions as to what can be causing the problem.
Nov 1, 2005 #2 NWNinja IS-IT--Management May 24, 2005 166 SE Try this instead, if you for instance want to skip all dirs named "tmp" and "TMP" (not the same thing). << / >> +skip: tmp TMP Upvote 0 Downvote
Try this instead, if you for instance want to skip all dirs named "tmp" and "TMP" (not the same thing). << / >> +skip: tmp TMP
Nov 2, 2005 #3 NWvictim Technical User Oct 25, 2005 5 RU I think you need << /tmp >> +skip: . (dot after +skip it means "skip all files in current directiry, which is /tmp Upvote 0 Downvote
I think you need << /tmp >> +skip: . (dot after +skip it means "skip all files in current directiry, which is /tmp
Nov 2, 2005 #4 GunnarD IS-IT--Management Oct 7, 2005 82 SE Om my machine the following is in default unix directive: << /tmp >> skip: .?* * And no files in /tmp is backed up. Upvote 0 Downvote
Om my machine the following is in default unix directive: << /tmp >> skip: .?* * And no files in /tmp is backed up.
Nov 2, 2005 #5 605 Instructor May 18, 2003 3,283 DE The directive is ok. But is /tmp a symbolic link. If so, it woould not be followed according to the 'uasm' manpage. Upvote 0 Downvote
The directive is ok. But is /tmp a symbolic link. If so, it woould not be followed according to the 'uasm' manpage.