Tek-Tips is the largest IT community on the Internet today!

Members share and learn making Tek-Tips Forums the best source of peer-reviewed technical information on the Internet!

  • Congratulations SkipVought on being selected by the Tek-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Basic SProc Question? If Recorset Empty

Status
Not open for further replies.

gus121

Technical User
May 9, 2002
298
0
0
GB
I have a stored proc with a basic query which is returned as a recordset.

However there are certain circumstances where the recordset may return no records. In which case i wish to execute anouther SQL db query instead. I wish to implement the 2nd query in the same stored proc how is this done?

My existing query is as follows.

Code:
ALTER    PROCEDURE [dbo].[usp_CategorySectionGet]
	@CategoryID int,
	@SiteID int
	
AS
SELECT
	[C].Section_ID,
	[C].Section_Mask,
	[S].SectionName
FROM
	tblCategories AS [C]
	
JOIN

tblSections AS [S]

ON
	[C].Section_ID = [S].SectionID

WHERE 
	[C].Category_ID = @CategoryID 
AND 
	([S].SiteMask & @SiteID > 0)

The SQL i would like to run if the recorset is empty is something like this:

Code:
SELECT
	[C].Section_ID,
	[C].Section_Mask,
	[S].SectionName
FROM
	tblCategories AS [C]
	
JOIN

tblSections AS [S]

ON
	[C].SectionMask_ID & [S].SectionMaskID

WHERE 
	[C].Category_ID = @CategoryID 
AND 
	([S].SiteMask & @SiteID > 0)

-Gus
 
You can check the value of @@ROWCOUNT right after you run the first query - if @@ROWCOUNT = 0, then no rows have been returned

[sub]"In vain have I struggled. It will not do."[/sub]
 
Hi thanks i tryed your method but it returned two recordsets and empty recordset and a second recordset.

I am running a little ASP app and i dont think it can cope easily with two recorsets.

thanks



-Gus
 
you could run a SELECT COUNT(...) before deciding which query to run?

[sub]"In vain have I struggled. It will not do."[/sub]
 
Hi thanks for your help.
I tryed using the If Exists Method and this seems to work.

For me neither your or my solution seems clean or an efficient way of running a query.

If anyone has a cleaner leaner solution then they would be most welcome to post it.

thanks

-Gus
 
if you are running more the one query in your SP then you should use

set nocount on

this will only return the final outcome of the SP

Mo
 
Hi Mo,

Since i put this query up i noticed that i had forgot to set nocount on. Which i normaly do as a matter of course as without setting no count on it normaly causes more problems than it is worth.

However the first query using the @@rowcount still apperes to return two recordsets and does not function in my ASP app even when Set NOCOUNT ON is set.

thanks

-Gus
 
The @@rowcount will always return the total rows of every query even with the nocount set.

I would declare a variable and do a select count as LFCfan suggested and then run the main query within an if statement.

Mo
 
When i mean it does not function i mean it throws up an error when i run the query in the ASP.

Surely this method is as good as the Count Method e.g:

If EXISTS(SELECT id FROM tblname WHERE id=1)
....
Else
....

Compared to:

SELECT @recordcount = count(id)FROM tblname WHERE id=1

If @recordcount > 0
.....
Else
....


thanks



-Gus
 
is not ASP that give you problems is ADO.
the trik is totry and fool ADO into believing that only one query is run

You could write a function to test for existing records
and then run your query

Mo
 
Hi Mo,

thanks i will bear that in mind. For the moment that is too much work.

thanks



-Gus
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor

Back
Top