I am not getting consistent results in my tables after running a subroutine that performs about 35 Access steps (instead of doing them manually). I'm wondering if anyone has experience with this type application (basically automating manual steps)?
Background (sorry for lengthy): The Access steps consistent of Making Table queries (generally running stored queries with DoCmd.OpenQuery which put sums in a table), using DAO to rename the summed fields, running append queries using using DoCmd.RunSQL, running Update queries using ADO, and running Select queries using both stored queries and ADO (latter to get record counts for display on form). I generally get different results shown in my final report (which is based on cross-tab query of result tables) when I SetWarnings True (whereby Access asks me to respond to every Make-Table, etc. operation) versus using SetWarnings False (no Access questions - just speed through all steps). All my answers to system warning questions are Yes, so I don't see why I need to manually respond on every action query. But when I go "slow" and respond to every question, the results are better.
Thanks for any insights, Jeff
Background (sorry for lengthy): The Access steps consistent of Making Table queries (generally running stored queries with DoCmd.OpenQuery which put sums in a table), using DAO to rename the summed fields, running append queries using using DoCmd.RunSQL, running Update queries using ADO, and running Select queries using both stored queries and ADO (latter to get record counts for display on form). I generally get different results shown in my final report (which is based on cross-tab query of result tables) when I SetWarnings True (whereby Access asks me to respond to every Make-Table, etc. operation) versus using SetWarnings False (no Access questions - just speed through all steps). All my answers to system warning questions are Yes, so I don't see why I need to manually respond on every action query. But when I go "slow" and respond to every question, the results are better.
Thanks for any insights, Jeff