Thanks to duane for the reference. I have reviewed the code & discussion and can say there does seem to be some value to the rationale.
I have never (to the best recollection of my aging / failing memory) been tasked with providing a set of sequential dates without other data being related. In fact, my experience has been more to reporting ONLY dates which have relevance to the data of interest. But I can see the advantage of the table of dates in generating the contigious sequence without related data.
A, perhaps, more common request / requirement from my experience was the example of reporting the dates "of every third Friday".
I would take issue with a few of the items included in the actual calendar and / or touted as 'advantages'. Principally, the inclusion of the Hoildays in the base calendar seems, to me, a large waste. My rationale being that EVERY organization I have worked with 'customizes' their holidays, sometimes to the extreme. One (extreme?) instance was the 'observance' of at least five (minor?) holidays in the Christmas / New Years period! The rationale of the company was that many employees took the time off anyway, which made production quite difficult, so the arrangement made production planning much easier and pleased the employees!. Further, I see only a very small penalty for maintaining the holiday list seperatly.
I also wonder why one would include the Fiscal Year, but not the Fiscal Quarter?
In my 'review', I also added a "Week of the month' field. I recognise this is / can be an issue a-la the ISO week of the year, but (again from my experience) I have had several to numerous occassions to need this information.
Thanks, again to duane and MajP in particular for helping me ubderstand their points of view.
MichaelRed