Tek-Tips is the largest IT community on the Internet today!
Members share and learn making Tek-Tips Forums the best source of peer-reviewed technical information on the Internet!
-
Congratulations SkipVought on being selected by the Tek-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!
Actual average throughput
- Thread starter gisac
- Start date
TricycleAvenger
Technical User
HAHAHHAHA.. sorry... that is funny that they told you that, I think they are full of it sometimes.
That is hard to believe- Since it's their software, you'ld think if there was a bug that under reported throughput they'ld immediately issue a patch (I would!) - This is probably more akin to a car dealer telling you that you needed to "add 20 mpg to what that gov'ment sticker says, to get the 'true' reading..."
NickFerrar
MIS
Sounds a little crazy to me.
Mind you if the throughout time includes the pre-backup calculations and the database update at the end then the throughput figures would be a fair bit under the true rate.
We have one server that does about 25 sessions on it's backup (multiple servers and multiple logical drives) - it takes it about 1.5 hours to update the ARCserve database and about 8 hours for the actual job to run.
Mind you if the throughout time includes the pre-backup calculations and the database update at the end then the throughput figures would be a fair bit under the true rate.
We have one server that does about 25 sessions on it's backup (multiple servers and multiple logical drives) - it takes it about 1.5 hours to update the ARCserve database and about 8 hours for the actual job to run.
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
- Question