I have a unbound form that contains 6 fields on it. For example:
Field1 + Field2 = Field3
Field4 + Field5 = Field6
10 + 10 = 20
20 + 30 = 30
The form displays fine. I have a query that uses the calculated fields of field3 and field6. When I run the access query in Access 2k I get check boxes displayed in place of the values of the numbers. This problem occurs when I try to display any calculated fields from the forms in the query result set. When I run the same query or queries in Access 97 my queries behave fine.
To make things even more wierd. If I surround the fields with the function cint or str... I get get the correct values displayed in access 2k.
Is there an integration problem between Forms and Queries where you have to define the form's calculated controls explicit data type in Access 2k query? The reason I ask is I have a number of questionaire type applications that have queries driven by forms and their values. Some are quite large, so I was wonder is this just a problem in Access 2k and XP? Is this issue by design? Is there a simple work around without excessive coding?
Thanks
Field1 + Field2 = Field3
Field4 + Field5 = Field6
10 + 10 = 20
20 + 30 = 30
The form displays fine. I have a query that uses the calculated fields of field3 and field6. When I run the access query in Access 2k I get check boxes displayed in place of the values of the numbers. This problem occurs when I try to display any calculated fields from the forms in the query result set. When I run the same query or queries in Access 97 my queries behave fine.
To make things even more wierd. If I surround the fields with the function cint or str... I get get the correct values displayed in access 2k.
Is there an integration problem between Forms and Queries where you have to define the form's calculated controls explicit data type in Access 2k query? The reason I ask is I have a number of questionaire type applications that have queries driven by forms and their values. Some are quite large, so I was wonder is this just a problem in Access 2k and XP? Is this issue by design? Is there a simple work around without excessive coding?
Thanks