BoulderBum
Programmer
I'm preparing to network several of my computers at home and am looking into what to buy. Sorry if these are dumb questions, but I need to know.
If I'm using my main rig as a server, what I want is an wireless router and the proper NICs on all my systems, correct? I noticed there are DSL/Cable routers too, but I assume these just share a direct internet connection. I'm wondering about this because a point of confusion I'm running into relates to what the differences between the routers are.
I can still share a connection with the normal wireless router, right? Additionally, I can implement greater security through a centralized firewall if I choose to run the connection through my server, and out to the router, correct? Is the advantage of the DSL/Cable router simply that a central computer doesn't need to be running for the connection to be up?
Also, do any of you Tek-Tippians have any recommendations or references to side-by-side comparisons of competing 802.11g vendors? I've read that there are some issues with some systems because the hardware for the protocol is relatively young in development.
If I'm using my main rig as a server, what I want is an wireless router and the proper NICs on all my systems, correct? I noticed there are DSL/Cable routers too, but I assume these just share a direct internet connection. I'm wondering about this because a point of confusion I'm running into relates to what the differences between the routers are.
I can still share a connection with the normal wireless router, right? Additionally, I can implement greater security through a centralized firewall if I choose to run the connection through my server, and out to the router, correct? Is the advantage of the DSL/Cable router simply that a central computer doesn't need to be running for the connection to be up?
Also, do any of you Tek-Tippians have any recommendations or references to side-by-side comparisons of competing 802.11g vendors? I've read that there are some issues with some systems because the hardware for the protocol is relatively young in development.