Search results for query: *

Hi seong76 I am not sure, but I think that you can run at full duplex with the 2500 if you want. Try to update your ios to a 12.2 or latter one and see. Cheers.

Hi, one question, if perform a show ip inter brief do you see a public IP address at your ethernet0/0 interface? Thanks.

Was that document enought? Do you need further help? If so, please detail more or less the arquitecture of your network (is there a DMZ or not, wich services must be accesible from Internet, wich kind of aplications do you want your users to reach at Internet, and so on) and we will try to give...

There are ideas, but also dubts. Please give us more info: Now, from your router, you are being pointed to a default gateway that is not able to route you to Internet. You also have an internet gateway, that still is live, rechable from your router. Is this assumption ok? If so, what kind of...

Both, the ones generated via SDM and yours are the same. The only difference is the way they were wrotten. As far as I has been able to see, with that configuration you are only allowing some servers at the net 10.10.1.0 to speak with some other servers at the net 10.10.2.0. Please, try to...

It has been a pleasure. Regards. Sam.

I agree with your comment, but AT&T should not being agregating routes from the address space of other provider, isn't it? Therefore, the C classes provided by AT&T will be agregated at AT&T and the C classes provided by PDT will be agregated at PDT. Please, correct me if I am wrong in that...

I agree with jneiberger in that point. The best solution is learning partial or full routes from Internet, but as he points, to achieve that you should have large memory at those routers. Also, another thing, is quite strange that you are only reciving traffic from one of the ISP and not from...

Please, could you provide more details about the underlaying problem? Does the routers work fine for internet browsing but not for the the VPN traffic or neither? Do you need all the traffic going over the VPN tunnel? I can see a cuple of points that could be preventing you to reach internet...

Checked on lab, I think that the asumption is ok. 1. Configured BGP without redistributing statics, but with a a backup route. All worked ok, after the main link came up, the router deleted the backup route to 10.20.2.1 and used again the BGP one. *Mar 1 00:25:45.871: BGP(0): 192.168.1.5...

One point, please jneiberger correct me if it is wrong: As far as I have been able to see, lets follow the route 197.98.3.0. All works ok when learning about that route via BGP over the mpls link. Great. Now, the circuit fails. The router add a new static at its routing table. The router now...

The problem here seems to be as follows: As your eBGP neighbour must be reached over the BGP link and all the traffic is going over the secondary link, there is no way for your router making an adjacency with the other BGP router when the statics route all the traffic over the secondary link...

Maybe the firewall will be able to do that. I am aware that Checkpoint can work in that way, and load balance between the two servers if needed. Another solution could pass through he configuration of the DNS server with BIND and using the following perl scrip for HA, see below lnks below...

Please, more details are needed for progressing with this: Is this the correct topology? PublicNetIP | | | CISCO | | InternalLAN Did you configured into the public interface "ip nat outside" and at the internal interface "ip nat inside"? Regards. Samuel Bonete.

I think you have checked it but, just in case. The problem could be related with an incorrec subnet mask being assigned to the host of the network via the DHCP or an incorrect subnet mask at the Router.

Hi all, This router uses a ppp link configured to use 2000Mbps. Our netcool showed that sometimes the utilization of the link was over the 170%, so, many questions were generated: 1. How was possible that NO DISCARD nor CRC errors where in the interface if it was working at 170%. 2. How was...

Mr20, be sure that all the hosts belong to the same ip net and their subnet mask are identical. Cheers.