Search results for query: *

Hello... I'm new to the world of Linux. I have a LAN here that has a shared T-1 line out to the Internet. Our ISP is running a firewall/proxy setup on their side, so are behind them with a private IP scheme on the LAN. What I'd like to do is set up some type of box that has all of my http...

Mike, Okay, the next time I get a chance, I'll see if I can create a new config that's a little more basic. If you can find the time to set up that lab, that would be great...maybe that would eliminate the possibility that the 1604 I'm working with is messed up in some way. You've already...

Hey wybnormal... Do you think it might be in my best interest to save off the current startup config, and then create a new one that is more "bare bones?" Maybe something that would give me the ISDN connection, plus set up the basic NAT, but leave out all of the extra access list...

Okay, I tried that and here's the results. I made sure that each interface stated "ip directed-broadcast" instead of "no ip directed-broadcast" before I began. Here's the results of the "show ip nat trans" and "show ip nat stat" BEFORE trying the PCA...

Okay, I just got back from there and I probably won't be getting back over there until early next week. But I'll try that stuff ASAP and post the results. The no ip directed-broadcast line was already there, so I have no idea what it does. Sounds like you do, so I'll ditch it. :-) I can't...

wybnormal: Okay, I tried those commands on the 1604, but I could not get anything to go through. Here's the NAT statement that was already there: ip nat inside source list 121 interface BRI0 overload And here are the lines that I entered. I tried entries for pcANYWHERE and for tftp: ip...

Hi wybnormal... Sorry, there was one other thing I had meant to ask in my previous reply. Since pcANYWHERE requires 2 different ports, do I need to create two additional statements or just one statement with two different port references? Thanks again! Dan

Thanks wybnormal... I'll give that a try as soon as I can. One other question (thanks for being patient with me). Do I add that statement in addition to the "ip nat inside source list 121 interface BRI0 overload", or does the statement you gave me replace the old one? It seems like...

Hello... I'm fairly new to configuring Cisco routers and I've run into a jam on my first job...DOH! The system I'm working with has an ISDN connection to their ISP. They have a LAN with a private IP scheme, 192.168.1.x, and they use NAT on a Cisco 1604 router in order for their LAN to have...