Our setup:
3 sites: NY, DE, FL
NY Site has moved.
PRI's cutover
3300 mxe shutdown, moved, etc
everything was cutover and turned up. internal dialing among all the offices operational. Our problem: inbound calls on the PRI fail. we can see the calls hitting the pbx thru ccs trace:
11:39:17...
This has been a problem for a month or so now and I can't seem to pinpoint exactly the cause. Here is the situation....
if you receive a voicemail on Friday, your phone set will blink indicating a new voicemail waiting.... when you arrive Monday morning, the MWI no longer is blinking despite...
I contacted our partner who could not get me answer other then not until October this year at the earliest. With that being said, does any one know if Unified Communicator Advanced 3.1 supports office 2010?
I tried installing UC 3.0.21 with office 2010 and received a message stating Outlook was...
I am somewhat perplexed and need a brainstorming partner. Here is a description of the setup:
Our main line is a speed call #. The speed call number points to a device on the system (ext. 4000). Ext. 4000 is set to ALWAYS reroute to a HG (hg#4900); HG4900 members include 5 lines for incoming...
Here is the resolution:
Following the lead on this discussion: http://www.tek-tips.com/viewthread.cfm?qid=1503503&page=68
I decided to change the following setting in COS of the IP Trunk: suppress simulated ccm after isdn progress
This setting was changed from YES to NO.
Conferencing and...
maybe we are on to something here... When adding an entry to Sys-A or Sys-B, is the termination type ROUTE, LIST, or PLAN? What determines the appropriate setting? My assumption is:
ROUTE = will follow route assignment form
LIST = will follow route list assignment (optional) form
PLAN = will...
I am somewhat new to Mitel, so some of the knowledge i have is what I have read through help files and various other documentation. My understanding of the COS option was to display that information between VM systems (we do have resiliency and a backup VM system in Sys-B)
Record a call is set...
Why wouldn't we set COV VM port to YES for the IP Trunk? Don't we want the VM system to uniquely identify the party receiving a message?
This I agree with and is easy enough to change.
no worries... I had to leave for the day myself and just performing some catch-up here. We can definitely touch base tomorrow. I appreciate your help on this; I am stumped.
This is set to NO on the PRI COS
This is set to YES on the IP COS
This is set to NO on the PRI COS
I assume this should...
I will repost as CSV... thats not a problem at all! see links:
http://www.mediafire.com/file/grzdwiijzo2/cos13-ip.csv
http://www.mediafire.com/file/myxfukhzvnu/cos-12-pri.csv
http://www.mediafire.com/file/mmz1ndymxzd/cos-20-stna.csv
Sys-A Stn assigned COS/COR of IP Trunk. Local conference successful
under cos -- public trunk = NO
COS of PUBLIC TRUNK, LOCAL PRI, AND Sys-A Stn follows:
<let me know when downloaded so I may remove these files from the hosting site - thank you>...
YES
YES
It appears that whenever I utilize the IP trunk w/ the remote systems PRI, conferencing fails.
Another test I just performed was a Sys-B Stn hotdesked into Sys-A. Stn-B could not conference when dialing out the Sys-B PRI from login location Sys-A. Stn-B also could not conference...
I appreciate your timely responses....
.........Success.........
Here are additional steps and the results
Local set - Local PRI - Local PRI - Success
Local set - Local PRI - Remote PRI - Failure
Local set - Remote set - Local PRI - Success
- conferencing is functional on the 5330's until i...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.