Search results for query: *

in SLS you can de-activate the ARID for the nodes that have been removed ( release its ID) that stops the dlm for checking for it and now in SLS you can also remove members yourself ( one of the very few improvements from AMC)

not sure i understand - are you saying the user is logging into the domain or on the domain controller ? if they are logging into a pc , then the connection wizard should be run as a local admin for each user so that it can write to the registry / create local folders correctly we normally use a...

"ARS entries aren't being properly populated across our devices" very little is shared regarding ARS - from memory cor groups and ARS digit mod can be shared routes arent shared route lists arent shared ars digits dialled isnt shared this is due to a number of reasons , one is that you cant...

there was a kms article mentioning the curl error although that was for physical not virtual controllers S07077 MiVB - Backup fails when using Server Manager backup with SFTP option enabled on MXEIII & CXII Symptoms When performing a backup from MiVB Server-Manager Backup with SFTP option...

what i meant is have you jumped on an affected MSL server, logged in as root and tried to connect to your sftp server that will do the certificate exchange between the MSL and the remote SFTP server testing from something else isnt going to help locate the issue

have you tried a manual sftp transfer from console sftp username@ServerAddress:/foldername you might see some more information provided as to the cause of the failure

what makes you think the link is up? why are you not matching ports for the trunk - both ends should be using same port what kind of gsm gateway is it? i have done this using 2n and mediatrix before

i had a similar issue with an ubuntu sftp server - i had applied updates to it and that changed the supported cyphers, only some of the MSL servers that were sending to it were affected. i reverted the server to a previous version of ubuntu and they started all working again , - was older MSL...

check the permissions for the user that you are logged in as , or create an admin user that has all calls permissions

depends what you mean by resize - its based on a number of image files of a particular size - matching screen dimensions if you want part of the image to be smaller or larger you would have to sort that out with an image editor 6920 6930/6930L 6940 Dimensions W x H (pixels): 320x240...

dont think so , pretty sure its built in and fixed, there were some config for 53xx that could eliminate it but both branding and screensaver for 69xx is based only on image files - no other tweaking is available

thats not smdr - looks miore like a ccs trace, if there is no incoming calling line id , then there is no incoming calling line id - not sure what you are asking? Do you have a sip trace or packet capture , or actual SMDR

might be worth checking the audit logs to see what has been changed

when we use srv for Public TW sip device resiliency we do the following create a records for each TW MBG mbg1.site.com- resolves to the public IP of the 1st TW server mbg2.site.com- resolves to the public IP of the 2nd TW server create public srv records _sip._tcp.mbg.site.com Priority 1...

have you tested the srv from the mbg console to confirm that its returning results

the problem will be with support , if you are overconfiguring it and there are any issues that appear to be resourse related , that will be mitels response - its been over configured - remove some devices . i currently have a micollab server in same situation - showing capacity alarms as it was...

did you actually dial the digits for the outgoing call on the 5312 or use a speed dial key? whats set in system options for last number redial source?

you can try and locate the other subroutine / workflow using some sql queries replace ZZZZ-Delete with subroutine name USE CCMData Select Name from tblConfig_VWM_Callflow Where pkey in ( Select FKCallflow from tblConfig_VWM_CallflowSubroutineMembers Where FKSubroutine in (Select pkey from...

do you have any intercepts configured for the trunk ?

seems to be yet another short sighted design from mitel - express also had a heap of limitations and then they gave up on it , wouldnt be surprised to see this go the same way