Search results for query: *

I have a wierd problem...when attempting to use outlook with exchange, i enter the users name in the Microsoft Exchange setup in outlook and hit check name. It comes back and tells me that Outlook cannot communicate with the address book and the name cannot be resolved. On a laptop right next to...

my windows 2000 machine is connecting to a cisco router. Its a VPN connection and the cisco router is handing out the IP addresses. Since they are dynamic, trying to access a 192.168.100.0 network, the machines tries and goes through the gateway but of course fails. If I set the VPN connection...

Any chance someone knows how to do an Route Add for a dynamic IP address... I have a VPN connection that keeps pulling an address (dynamic) and the only way I can make it work is if the IP is static and I add a Route Add statement to tell the PC that all 19.168.100.0 traffic to use that static...

no because even I can't send email and I am getting the right IP's for eveything...Anyway I can delete all this and start over again??

The domain 'tdshetler.com' is an invalid Internet domain name. Message was undeliverable. Message originally to: but if i do nslookup through the net it comes up with right IP

yes everything is changed and i can get to my web as well as others on this web server...my domain is the only one with mail..

I am hosting DNS myself and I recreated the mx record...

Due to a recent ISP change, I had to change the IP Address of my server..I got all the obvious IP references but mail is still getting bounced back to the sender when trying to send to me...anyone have any ideas??

I think I figured out my problem....my second DSL line isn't working and I think it has something to do with this line... ip nat inside source route-map nonat interface Ethernet0/1 overload If i change it to Ether0/2 then my second interface will work.... any ideas??

when setting up the route...does the 100 come before or after the 0.0.0.0 's??? I currently have them setup like this ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 <next hop> ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 <next hop> 100

interface Ethernet0/1 description AT&T ip address <address withheld> no ip proxy-arp ip accounting output-packets ip nat outside no ip route-cache no ip mroute-cache ip policy route-map static half-duplex no cdp enable crypto map cntmap ! interface Ethernet0/2 description UUNet ip...

I am using an internal dns server and I have eliminated the DNS possibility by shuting down the one interface and doing a ping..This is the result.. Pinging 65.2.208.61 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 192.168.100.28: Destination host unreachable. Request timed out. Request timed out. Request...

Gateway of last resort did what you thought it would do when I shutdown the one device, but I couldn't get out through the net...any ideas why the traffic didnt go anywhere??

how come if I try to ping e0/2 (which correspondes to my secondary route statement) I don't get any reply....also, how long does it take for the secondary IP Route to take over when the first route fails??

Thanks so much, I will try it...

I have 2 connections to the internet in my company. I want to set it up so that if DSL line #1 goes down, DSL line #2 kicks on and lets all out going traffic to the net so that it looks like the dsl lines never went down....I believe it is done like this, but I am not a 100% sure... ip route...

I need help setting up Outlook Web Acces...anyone know a good place to go look to figure out how to set this up.... thanks...

I am trying to setup exchange 2000 server for the first time. I can actually send messages from the domain but I am unable to recieve them..Users get: An error occured while delivering this message. <email address here> The error is stated below: 550 5.7.1 Unable to relay for <email address...

In Outlook, the option to add the &quot;From Field&quot; and send out messages as other users exists. I was just wondering how I could turn this off. I've seen it done in other companies I've been to, I just don't know how to do it myself. I believe its an Exchange issue, rather than an Outlook...