Search results for query: *

Thanks, DukeSSD, but these are on the local drawers. As I already said, these used to be directly attached to old LPARs, with rootvg on a single disk. Please note that the disks that were not a part of the old rootvg now behave normally. I guess there is a pretty simple solution, but maybe due...

The whole situation seems quite buggy to me. See output form WebSM Vital Product Data on Hdisk2 and 3: hdisk2 U1.9-P1/Z1-A8 Other SCSI Disk Drive Manufacturer................IBM Machine Type and Model......ST373454LC Part...

hdisk6 0036872af893fe25 rootvg active hdisk7 none None hdisk8 none None hdisk0 none None hdisk1...

I got it added to another LPAR: hdisk0 Available 47-08-02 1814 DS4700 Disk Array Device hdisk1 Available 47-08-02 1814 DS4700 Disk Array Device hdisk2 Available 2s-08-00-8,0 Other SCSI Disk Drive hdisk3 Available 2s-08-00-8,1 Other SCSI Disk Drive hdisk4 Available...

Thanks, guys, I will attach the controller now and see if any of these work. Dimitar

Thanks, ogniemi, They are now Defined for I removed the controller from this particular LPAR (not DLAPR) and rebooted. If I remove these and attach the controller again, I will get the same; I was asking for a convenient way to fully erase contents and destroy what seems to be the remains of an...

Hi, I had a regatta with 8 LPARS, I now have a regatta with 4 LPARS and a bunch of HDDs from the already deleted LPARs. If I assign the SCSI controller to another LPAR, it works, but I get 10 HDDs instead of three: hdisk4 Defined 2s-08-00-8,0 Other SCSI Disk Drive hdisk5 Defined...

Thanks, ubihga, but fsck does not run: fsck: Cannot find the vfs value for file system /dev/hdisk1 and the same for /dev/hdX The rootvg can not be accessed in maint mode /the system does actually see the vg and its contents, but importvg returns error/ It seems that the LPAR is going to be...

Hello, The situation is like this: A LPAR on a 16CPU Regatta does not boot. Here is the output from the console: Elapsed time since release of system processors: 689862 mins 2 secs...

Thanks, guys. The main idea is that the hostname is not trasferred to the DNS server, so it will not be tricked. p5wizard, Thanks for the tip, but the two machines do not talk to each other, at least not now. Thanks, Mitko

Thanks! Sorry for the stupid questions, but I was not sure what the local hostname was used for, i.e. if it is not going to ne sent to the DNS server and thus confuse it. If it is a totally local resource, it will obviously do no harm if different from the DNS record.

Hi, I've not been for long in the area, so please someone give me a tip: - May more than one AIX machine with the same hostname reside in the same physical LAN? - May the local hostname and the DNS record be different? The AIX is not the DNS server, but due to licensing constrains we must keep...