Yes, I have the choice to go right to 2003, and I prefer 2003. But I'm afraid to make things more complicated, with the mix 5.5/2000/2003 and one more forestprep/domainprep. The ADC-connector is in another site, and that department want's E2000 now, not 2003.
My company has one AD with four Exchnage 5.5 sites today. The migration to Exchange 2000 has started in one site four months ago, but they have problems. Is it a good idea to go for Exchange 2003 in next site, or should we stay on Exchange 2000 until all 5.5 are upgraded? The main reason for...
My company has about 150 users, and we plan to buy new servers. Is it good to have Backup Exec on the same server as Exchange, or should we choose to run only Exchange on the server?
I have performed an upgrade from Backup Exec 8.9 to 9.0. But the SQL agent was not installed in 8.6, and I have the license key for 9.0. How do I add it after upgrade? My license key was not accepted in the new version.
I read that all agents should be installed before the upgrade, do I have to...
It seems that I have to install new agents on all servers. But the settings in my jobs, do they stay? Or should I type everything down just in case? What is best to start with, to upgrade server first, or the agents?
My company is planning for an upgrade from Exchange 5.5. But what is the best choice, Exchange 2000 or go directly to Exchange 2003? Less than 500 users in the company.
A company is now using Exchange 5.5 with no mailbox limits, and many users have mailbox size of 300-500 MB. The server stores more than 100 mailboxes. I have read about the 16 GB limit in Exchange 2000, and the company is planning for a migration to E2K. I have the following questions:
Is there...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.