Thanks. I had found Navicat, used the trial version as long as I could. Then I ended up paying for the full version, it works very well, and it suits me a lot better than the pgadmin plugin did.
I used to use pgadmin2 with their very helpful data migration wizard. Well, server's been upgraded and pgadmin2 no longer works with the newest version of postgresql. Pgadmin3 still does not have the equivalent function.
I've searched all around trying many different software, the only one...
To add, I know I can update the script to be:
<cfquery datasource="..." name="...">
SELECT * FROM table WHERE field1='#Replace(variable,"''","''''","ALL")#'
</cfquery>
But I'd hope I wouldn't have to on each query.
Quick Example:
<cfquery datasource="..." name="...">
SELECT * FROM table WHERE field1='#variable#'
</cfquery>
Let's say variable = "foo'bar"
In CF6.1 and CF8, the query passed to the database is:
SELECT * FROM table WHERE field1='foo''bar'
If variable = "foo''bar"
In CF6.1, the query...
I put in a tape drive on a Win2000 machine that's acting as a small file server. Using the included backup software, I was running into a snag. I was doing a couple test schedule runs, and if the tape was blank the backup ran. However if the tape had something on it, the test scheduled backup...
www.memtest86.com tells you the memory speed.
Seriously, look for ddr400 or pc3200 to tell you that it's the memory you want. If the ram isn't labelled with either marking, then don't buy the ram.
I can't think of any instance where I've seen or heard of mis-labelled ram - if the ram ends up...
The 20 to 24 pin adapter doesn't really do anything useful. The extra wires are there to allow the motherboard to draw more amperage if needed & have more stable voltage. The adapters do not work towards the purpose.
Most all motherboards work just fine with the 20-pin connector in a 24-pin...
I'm a little worried that reformatting the card might make it inaccessable by the camera it is being used with.
I'm going to get a second card to test out further.
I just want to be able to do a straight data copy off the card. But as it is right now, say there are 10 images in the directory...
I'm trying to think of solutions to a problem working with flash memory cards - I have a reader and when I put a secure digital card into the reader, I can read and copy off all the contents, but before accessing each and every file, XP throws up a write protection error that I have to click...
I maintain an application for a company, and we've run into some instances in the past.
(1) Coldfusion Administrator lost the mail server setting and reverted back to localhost. Not sure why, but it happened.
(2) The mail server has gone down for some length of time
In both cases, Coldfusion...
I take that back, there still are some issues with the <doctype>, Mozilla, & JavaScript. The test page I put up worked, but the actual page I'm writting does not, it is a ColdFusion page, so maybe the .cfm extension makes a difference, I don't know.
Since I didn't need the borders in the webpage I was rewriting, I just rearranged the table like below. Because even the example you suggest still does not work like desired in Internet Explorer.
<table>
<tr>
<td>
<table>
<tr>
<td height="30" bgcolor="red">Short</td>...
I've seen that in a lot of different systems. The memory controller is built into the cpu, so it's mainly independant of the motherboard you purchase.
In the bios, just manually set the ram to a 200mhz clock (ddr400 speeds).
Okay, I was ready to put a test page up on the web to show as an example...
And when I uploaded it to a server, everything worked as it should.
But however, it still stands that when the .html file is on my local hard drive, neither Mozilla -or- Internet Explorer work correctly with the...
Well, I had already read over those pages, the issue is that with either doctype decleration, the following JavaScript line would not work in Mozilla 1.7.12 (the latest version):
document.getElementById('prodimage').style.top=100;
Whether it's a bug in Mozilla or not, I need JavaScript to...
I see two different doc types, the "loose" and the "strict", where it seems that the "loose" just lets me be more liberal in where I define css properties. And removing the doctype tag makes the browsers treat the document like it had the "loose" doctype.
All I know right now is with either...
Just an update, issue ended up being the <doctype> declaration at the top. I don't know anything about doctype's, so who knows. It was set to loose, and when I removed the whole line, everything worked in both browsers.
Well, I finally found a function through Google that gets me the coordinates I want in both IE & Mozilla/FireFox.
And I can get the desired results in IE now...
But I cannot change the image placement in Mozilla/FireFox yet. It must just be syntax or something, I'll keep searching.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.