Search results for query: *

Great, thanks for the response. At the MICS we are already on a PRI, so I'm assuming the enabler we currently would work. I'm going to be bringing a vendor in on this, but I've heard conflicting reports of what is and isn't possible here.

I've heard conflicting reports of this actually working without buying $12k in VOIP licenses. I have a base office with an MICS 6.1 with about 85 users. I'd like to get a point-to-point T1 to interface this office with a new remote location. At the new location I was told I can put a BCM50 and...

So if I make my "central" IPSEC endpoint a Cisco router with that IOS version or higher, I can setup tunnels to my remotes, and have my remote users connecto a Pix behind said router, THEN they will be able to access those remote sites?

Correct, I basically want to be able to VPN into Site A, and function as if I were on my network. That means, I want to be able to access a web site I have running out at Site B, by connecting to Site A and having my protected traffic routed through that network. I've seen it working well before...

I can, I'm just trying to avoid confusion first. I think this is a routing issue, that's why I was asking what the usual steps were. I've got these two pix's running, but when you connect with a VPN client to one site, you can t get to the other. I want to be able to access Site B by connecting...

Simple question that goes with the basics of VPN's I'm sure. Pix 506 (sute A) to 515 (sute B) setup, tunnel works just fine. I have users connecting to Site A, but now I need them to be able to access Site B while using the Site A connection. Shouldn't this just be automatically possible since...

I've got an MICS 6.1 using PRI. I'm trying to find out if anyone has interfaced a Brooktrout card with a similar setup. The end goal here is to have a block of DID's setup to point at a fax server which can email faxes to the user assigned to a specific DID. I'm planning on using FaxServe, but I...

Awesome thanks!

I've got a weird one. This is an MICS 6.1 using a PRI and a Callpilot 150. Recently I found that half of my users weren't getting Caller ID properly on incoming calls via the CLID. So, I went through every extension, re-assigned their lines to their phones, and enabled Caller ID via the 'Telco...

When you say client, is this just one person that will be working with your system?

You could make this a lot easier on yourself and just setup a dynamic map to allow VPN clients to connect individually.

I'm using two 506E's for a site to site tunnel between our two networks. Here's an example: Site1: 192.168.1.X Site2: 192.168.2.X Pix1 Outside: 172.100.100.1 Pix1 Inside: 192.168.1.1 Pix2 Outside: 172.101.101.1 Pix2 Inside: 192.168.2.1 Site1---[Pix1]....(VPN)....[Pix2]---Site2 Both sites are...

PAT is actually noted by Cisco's release notes not to function at all with VOIP. Using common sense it's kinda obvious anyway, but NAT should work just fine, as the outgoing/incoming streams for H.23X should be masq'd and forwarded, not port translated.

It's sort of hard to walk someone through a setup because everyone's VPN is different. First off, as a warning, the Pix PDM wizards kinda suck....really bad. There is a new version of the PDM called ASDM that is only available with the Pix 7.0 Operating System. Unfortunately that OS doesn't work...

Funk yeaw. That was it. Thanks atcom.

Oh, yes I had the lines assigned to specific sets before that way,however, when this is done, there is absolutely no Caller ID information displayed on the phones themselves. Almost as if the ICS isn't passing the info along with the call? Any other ideas?

Okay, to answer in order (from first response): - The prime is different for every line. Say I take line 200, I name it after the 4 digits in the Recv'd, then I set the line to Private for whatever extension I want it going to. Then I set the prime for the new line to whatever extension the...

I can understand why this is happening, but just don't know if it HAS to happen. I've got an MICS with 6.1. Just recently had a PRI setup and got a block of DID's with it. The problem is that all of the system users have 3 digit extensions and I had to explicitly setup the prime sets for each...

This is a stupid point because I'm guessing you've actually checked for other traffic...but can you telnet to the other end point? It doesn't look like you've permitted traffic from your endpoint into your network.

Okay, we've just had a PRI installed on an MICS w/6.1 and a CP 150. The extensions on this system are 3 digits and will be changed to 4 digits later to match the last 4 digits of each users DID. My question is this: how can I get the CallPilot to pickup on these DID's AND on each persons 3 digit...