Search results for query: *

Here's the scenario... I have a Windows 2003 forest "old.com" running Exchange 2000. We as an IT Department decided to build from scratch a new domain called "new.com" and run Exchange 2007. I do not want to migrate our entire company in one night or weekend, and therefore need both...

Switch 1: Show Run: BOI-2960G-1#sho run Building configuration... Current configuration : 4017 bytes ! version 12.2 no service pad service timestamps debug uptime service timestamps log uptime service password-encryption ! hostname BOI-2960G-1 ! enable password 7 100F081001123F121926 ! no aaa...

Here's Switch 1's "show etherchannel detail" BOI-2960G-1#sho etherchannel detail Channel-group listing: ---------------------- Group: 1 ---------- Group state = L2 Ports: 2 Maxports = 8 Port-channels: 1 Max Port-channels = 1 Protocol: PAgP...

I have 2 Cisco 2960's . I use Ports 45 - 48 in a Trunk mode and have created EtherChannels to attempt to double my link speed between the switches. When I do a "sho etherchannel detail, I show that on Switch 1 port 47 is "Down not in bundle" and on Switch 2 "Down not in bundle". However the...

Well, my implementation went well. I ended up ultimately as my original thread stated going with "channel-group # mode desirable non-silent" on all 4 of my 2960's, and everything is working great. I ended up ditching that HP gig switch because I didn't want to deal with mixing equipment in our...

I didn't setup the switches in a full mesh as I didn't want to tie up the other ports to do so. So really it's just: Switch 1 --> Switch 2 --> Switch 3 I had counted on STP stopping the secondary links in the event that the etherchannel was not setup properly. And in fact, that's exactly what...

Viper, It was in fact exactly as you stated in your first response to me. I now do the "show int etherchannel" command and both ports come up as "UP Mstr In-Bndl" now! So let me throw in a monkey wrench into the equation. Since PAgP is Cisco proprietary, what will the outcome of me...

The ehterchannels go from switch to switch. My hope was to bond two Gig interfaces to make for a higher uplink between all 3 switches.

I have 3 Cisco 2960's all 10/100/1000. I use Ports 45 - 48 in a Trunk mode and have created EtherChannels to attempt to double my link speed between the switches. I'm not sure that I'm getting that at this point because when I use the "sho int etherchannel" command it shows the secondary port...