I'm looking into replacing my lab equipment (4000x6 running 12.1)with newer equipment and have been eyeing the 2600 and 1700 series routers. Anyone have any preference and why? Thanks in advance.
Keith
X.X.X.7 is your inside address and X.X.X.58 is your global address correct?
If you remove the port assignments and lets say remove the deny statements from the acces-list does it translate at all or still doesnt work? try keeping the nat config simple to start with then add the complexity once...
On the Californa Router
int s1/0
encap frame-relay
int s1/0.111(Local-DLCI#)
ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.252
frame-relay interface-dlci 111(local-DLCI#)
int s1/0.112(Local-DLCI#)
ip address 192.168.1.5 255.255.255.252
frame-relay interface-dlci 112(local-DLCI#)
int...
Thanks for the reply Vipergg. I actually didn't state my question correctly. The question is does the spanning-tree algorithm actually run everytime the link changes state when portfast is enabled on the link?
Thanks
- you should gain speed due to the 3750 performing CEF which uses two forwarding tables, FIB (reformatted route table as well as host routes /32 mask) and Adjanceny (arp table) to forward packets at hardware speeds.
- Not sure/don't see how you would gain addtional security.
- only way i see...
Portfast puts an access port in which it is configured on directly into forwarding state. In addition loop detection is still in operation and TCN BPDUs aren't sent if the interface goes up or down. So my question is does the spanning-tree algorithm actually run everytime the link changes...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.