Search results for query: *

No responses for over a week, now, so I'll bump this one last time with emphasis on my original question. Is it possible to separate Layer 2 (Ethernet II, 0x8868 NBX Packets, according to wireshark) traffic and IP traffic from one interface and send them to two different interfaces on the...

Very good. Real class act there, suptec. If I had no intention of listening or learning I wouldn't have asked the question in the first place. It might just occur to someone else that I am attempting the suggestions given and then presenting the obstacles and challenges that I am presented...

The bridges are functioning simply as a length of CAT 5. All traffic comes in from my remote site via that CAT 5. I could set up vlans in my wireless bridges, but where it terminates in my main switches, there will be only one RJ-45 connector, exactly the same scenario that I have now. I'm...

Maybe this will help some. http://s188.photobucket.com/albums/z61/skiphenson/sams%20house/?action=view&current=paraduit.jpg

Here's a general idea of how it's currently set up. The two switches are managed switches and has a VLAN on it currently for testing the phone system. Router config as follows: 1720-split# sh running Building configuration... Current configuration : 1320 bytes ! ! Last configuration change...

No routers at the main site where this is located. Call processor, phone system controller is on our 10.0.0.xxx network, along with everything else.

You're absolutely right, as stated in the original problem, I have layer 2 traffic and layer 3 traffic that needs to be sent out two different physical interfaces. I have a few questions, and I don't want to sound bad in any way, so please forgive me if I do. What will moving the router to...

Here is the infrastructure that I have implemented at the moment to include the 1720 router (I have left the BR500 bridges out intentionally)(: Remote(data/ph)-----Router1720----Data | |--------Phone Remote is coming in via...

drtel, Thanks for your response, but here's what I have. I'll do my best to replicate your style. This is how it exists at the moment, the second is what I would like to do. Remote site(data/phone)--BR500~~~BR500---SWITCH---Mainsite(dataphone) Here is what I want to do...

Cisco BR500 bridges. They have a lan at my remote location, plugged into the bridges, everything (layer 2 and layer 3) gets shoved into my lan. The aerial bridges work just fine. I don't want to mess with those at all. But they come into my managed switch and from there I would like to...

The vlans didn't work with my setup. I have an hp4000M managed switch, but moving things around and setting up vlans didn't work. I have a remote shop that has data and phones over a mile away that travels by aerial bridge into my office (LAN/Server room). I am in the process of upgrading...

burtsbees, so how would I convince the two do do such a thing? Maybe I'm messing up in my routing table. I'm using 10.0.2.100 for fastethernet0 (incoming with data and phone), 10.0.0.100 for ethernet1 (data only), and 10.0.3.100 for ethernet0 (phone only). Traffic must be handed back and...

Treat it as a trunk. No. As for the separate IP ranges on each ethernet port, I would like to, but...since my phone system is layer 2, all phone traffic gets passed at that level so is therefore non-routable. Data traffic is routable, of course, with IPs for each pc on that lan. Bridging...

I have a Cisco 1720 with two Wic1Enet cards. This gives me a total of three ethernet interfaces. I have a situation where my phone system (layer 2) and data network(layer 3) is on the same switch. I would like to separate traffic coming in from one interface and direct network data to slot...