Search results for query: *

@stefanwagner: But that is clearly intended to be the first argument being the full path pointing to a pyw file, and that is needed as far as the cmd window on windows os. Well, I pass and it needs only a simple test to establish the need.

Have you read my response to your thread of the same problem? http://www.tek-tips.com/viewthread.cfm?qid=1637183&page=1 I did not post it lightly. You need to wrapper the path to pyw file with quotes because the path contains spaces. String[] cmd = {"C:\\Python23\\pythonw.exe"...

For i = 0 To (getVouchers.Length - 1) set getVouchersChildNodes=getVourchers.item(i).ChildNodes For j=0 To getVouchersChildNodes.Length-1 response.write getVouchersChildNodes.item(j).tagName & " = " & getVouchersChildNodes.item(j).text & "<br /><br />" Next Next

So? you can't even test correctly.

As I am not, I test it then. The result: it does.

>123456789123 - should yield 456789123 It does, does it not?

...else really know). My pattern is conceived with considerably generality, in particular the substring at the start to the last matching pattern, because of the looseness of the description in the op. [2.1] The revision should do, should it not? string pattern=@"\d{4,9}(?=($|[^ /\d-]*(...

...the string). [1] In that case, I would use this sketch. string input = "123456789ABC/123xxxyyysomething"; string pattern=@"\d{1,9}(?=($|[^ /\d-]*( |/|-)))"; //if $ is included. Match m=Regex.Match(input, pattern, RegexOptions.RightToLeft); string answer=""; if (m.Success) {...

I bet the List (myXmlDocumentList) is wrongly established. It would have .Count=1 only and the sole item is mixed up. The line concerning the big should be working just fine.

wxsl v1.0 is not expressive for this kind of constraints. It would be relegated to the application level "validation" in tandam with the validation process to the letter of wxsl. However, v1.1 work-in-progress will certainly give partial satisfaction of this kind of constraints. So the short...

...is the parsed json object. First, you've to correct the obvious mistake. trim is not a js function. var jsontext=xmlhttp.responseText.replace(/^\s*|\s*$/,""); var users=eval('('+jsontext+')'); [1] >for ( var recno in users ) { > str += '<li oonclick="putOwnerData( \'' +users[recno]+...

Please do not use red/bold or the sort in a prolonged block of message. It is unreadable.

Post the question to php forum. http://www.tek-tips.com/threadminder.cfm?pid=434

...of spirited approach to programming. That does not help a career. function strBrowser() { var i=1; for (i=1;i<=varNUM;i++) { var cmd = 'window.open("'+varURL+'")'; setTimeout(cmd, (i-1)*5000); } } This time you need to read every comma and apostroph of what I posted rather than that in the...

If you don't want to use session which involves some more variable matching that you can do wrong, you can always write the src attribute with the proper querystring and then in the oneitem.asp query again the db to write out the byte(). That takes two trips of fetching hence taking more time...

First thing first, why you take that mile to set i=1 and don't care to define what varNum is? and then varURL?

In the looping page, you establish session("x_1002")=rs("photo_front").value 'when 1002 is the mtarget or whatever in the querystring Then in the oneitem.asp, pick up the querystring and use response.binarywrite of the session("x_1002") or the corrsponding one and then clear the session...

There are only four lines in the link. I am sure you can read it again and again many times including the commas and apostrophes before you finish your lunch.

>@row = $sth->fetchrow_array; >foreach $row (@row){ > etc etc... >} This instead (it moves while fetching): while (my @row=$sth->fetchrow_array()) { #etc etc... }

[0] Q:>how i am supposed to go about looking into the source code A: Every browser has some button so that user can look at the source code. But if you have no idea of html, then it falls into the category of "lost control to everything." [1] Q:>and even how to put a link in the URL in the...