Recent content by mrcuser

Sorry I didn't paste the code as it was a simple cat file|awk '{print $1,$2}' grep -v : Thanks for the solution i'll try that now....

I have the following strings of data: 07/15/09 19:00:00,07/15/09 19:14:35,1900-WKDAY_INC,KN-ECS,Failed 12 07/15/09 20:00:00,,2000_INC,KN2-DIA-P0001,Missed but only need the following: 07/15/09 1900-WKDAY_INC,KN-ECS,Failed 12 07/15/09 2000_INC,KN2-DIA-P0001,Missed When I try to awk...

Sounds pretty similar to what we have setup. One thing to watch out for that did stop some of our problems was the lmcpd process running only on the library manager (in my case the LMC). I found the process was running on each TSM server so killed that and some problems where prevented. However...

Background on our setup: 1 TSM server - LMC controls 8 tsm server mount requests split over 2 libraries. Also we share physical hardware logically. ie. /dev/rmt1 is defined in TSM as RMT1_B and RMT1_C this causes additional problems for us as a drive can be in use but go to polling as the RMT_c...

Hmmmmm - we're using 11.2.9.0. We seem to get them when either a path it attempted to be updated and that drive is in use or just randomly.I've searched the actlog for whats running at the time of the error in the errpt report but have ended up finding nothing.

I will check tomorrow - the problem is intermittent it appeared to be around our zoning and pathing but thats all correct. Its a total pest.

We have 2 libraries which server 9 servers. I did a reteach on the library last night as well as rebooting our lmc - this has now fixed the reserve conflicts, and the paths have all stayed online.Hopefully this has addressed the problem.

Hi we have a lot of reserve conflicts in our errpt -a on our TSM servers the errors look like this: LABEL: RESERVE_CONFLICT IDENTIFIER: BF05CF18 Date/Time: Sat Feb 28 12:28:46 GMT 2009 Sequence Number: 2007 Machine Id: 005D754A4C00 Node Id: tsm5 Class...

The problem I am having is that when I issue a checkin libvol <library_name> <volume_name> status=private (or scratch) the tapes are scanned and not taken into the library. This is causing us a lot of pain as 1.no fresh scratch can be checked in 2.no volumes at a status of onsiteret can be...

Hi probablydown (good username!) thanks very much for this I was very very worried about this as we have thousands of tapes at this status (massive estate) reclamation has been started so these should dwindle - we have a lot of tape drives available so 2 is not a problem. Thanks again.

Hi Can anyone explain why the volumes in my 3592 library show as full when they aren't ? I've pasted a screen shot of my volumes - q v stg=onsite: C08319 ONSITE 3592_1C 510.3 G 45.0 Full C08372 ONSITE 3592_1C 594.5 G 28.7 Full C08444 ONSITE 3592_1C...

Hi We've recently bought some 3584 libraries but have hit a strange problem when checking tapes out. Our library manager controller TSM server checks out tapes without a request being issued. However our other server (not LMC) will not check a tape out without first loading it into a drive to...

Hi! I have 2 files,that contain a list of volumes: 1st has volumes in filesystem that are readable 2nd has volumes in the filesytem it think are unavailable First file is called readable Second file is called unavailable is there a command that does the opposite of diff to pick out any...

That's awesome thanks so much, just run that and extracted everything I need. Thanks again.

Well beauty is in the eye of the beholder and if this works does it matter! I'll try this soon and let you know, thanks loads it's really appreciated.