How do you all feel about this configuration? I know that it is best to put databases, logs and OS on different drive arrays but is it really the best for the bang of the buck.
How about this, Windows 2003 Server Ent, brand new IBM 3650, 8 GB RAM, dual 2.0 quad cores and 6X300 GB 15K RPM drives on one big RAID 5 array.
This would be over 1 TB on the C drive as proposed serving email to 700 WAN clients only on Exchange cache mode.
Currently we are running a Dell 2850 with a C drive at 280 GB on RAID 5. It seems to do very well in keeping up with 700 users.
I appreciate your opinions and recommendations.
How about this, Windows 2003 Server Ent, brand new IBM 3650, 8 GB RAM, dual 2.0 quad cores and 6X300 GB 15K RPM drives on one big RAID 5 array.
This would be over 1 TB on the C drive as proposed serving email to 700 WAN clients only on Exchange cache mode.
Currently we are running a Dell 2850 with a C drive at 280 GB on RAID 5. It seems to do very well in keeping up with 700 users.
I appreciate your opinions and recommendations.