Hi experts,
This isn't specific to IBM Raid but I know someone here can give me an answer.
Configuration: 1 HP Xeon server with 3 SCSI 36 GB drives on a single RAID-5 array.
The operation system, the database (SQL Server), the page file... everything is on the C drive.
I say we can improve performance by configuring a logical drive which would contain SQL Server. I think it is best to separate the o/s from the database.
My IT manager says it would not improve performance because
everything is still on the same physical drives, with the same number of read/write heads as before.
Can someone tell me who is correct and why ?
Thanks!
John
This isn't specific to IBM Raid but I know someone here can give me an answer.
Configuration: 1 HP Xeon server with 3 SCSI 36 GB drives on a single RAID-5 array.
The operation system, the database (SQL Server), the page file... everything is on the C drive.
I say we can improve performance by configuring a logical drive which would contain SQL Server. I think it is best to separate the o/s from the database.
My IT manager says it would not improve performance because
everything is still on the same physical drives, with the same number of read/write heads as before.
Can someone tell me who is correct and why ?
Thanks!
John