Hello,
I have been reading with dismay about an alarming trend in marketing NAS or other external storage boxes...the use of RAID 0 and JBOD, the two most dangerous forms of storage in terms of resiliency. I see these ads more and more, touting the storage method as a "feature" instead of a liability. An ad for Vantec's NexStarMX touts: "Supports JBOD Configuration; Turn two hard drives into One" that "allows you to archive precious family photos, music, videos and games with three easy clicks" and Maxtor's OneTouch III that ships in RAID 0 config by default. By default??? Come on now.
Sure, you have the "option" in both cases to reconfigure them into RAID 1, but then you lose half the space, not very sexy. As far as Joe and Judy User are concerned, "if the manufacturer sets it up this way, or recommends it, it must be the way to go" and "bigger is better" without being warned of the pitfalls of both JBOD and RAID 0.
While JBOD is not as dangerous as RAID 0, it's still a risky scenario when that video of baby's first steps is spanned across two disks willy-nilly and one of those disks goes bye-bye.
I don't know what the solution is except education. As people's data grows, they will need a place to store it. Safely. It is up to us to educate our customers, friends and relatives about these 2-drive boxes, and tell them their best bet is to run them in RAID 1, or better yet to buy a 3-or-4-drive RAID 5 eSATA unit, as what average user would think they need to backup a backup drive? </rant>
Tony
I have been reading with dismay about an alarming trend in marketing NAS or other external storage boxes...the use of RAID 0 and JBOD, the two most dangerous forms of storage in terms of resiliency. I see these ads more and more, touting the storage method as a "feature" instead of a liability. An ad for Vantec's NexStarMX touts: "Supports JBOD Configuration; Turn two hard drives into One" that "allows you to archive precious family photos, music, videos and games with three easy clicks" and Maxtor's OneTouch III that ships in RAID 0 config by default. By default??? Come on now.
Sure, you have the "option" in both cases to reconfigure them into RAID 1, but then you lose half the space, not very sexy. As far as Joe and Judy User are concerned, "if the manufacturer sets it up this way, or recommends it, it must be the way to go" and "bigger is better" without being warned of the pitfalls of both JBOD and RAID 0.
While JBOD is not as dangerous as RAID 0, it's still a risky scenario when that video of baby's first steps is spanned across two disks willy-nilly and one of those disks goes bye-bye.
I don't know what the solution is except education. As people's data grows, they will need a place to store it. Safely. It is up to us to educate our customers, friends and relatives about these 2-drive boxes, and tell them their best bet is to run them in RAID 1, or better yet to buy a 3-or-4-drive RAID 5 eSATA unit, as what average user would think they need to backup a backup drive? </rant>
Tony