Tek-Tips is the largest IT community on the Internet today!

Members share and learn making Tek-Tips Forums the best source of peer-reviewed technical information on the Internet!

  • Congratulations Mike Lewis on being selected by the Tek-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Which Version? 1

Status
Not open for further replies.

Michael42

Programmer
Oct 8, 2001
1,454
US
Hello,

I've been trying to decide which version of .Net ramp up on there are so many and just going with the latest might not always be the wisest choice.

The contenders seem to be 2008, 2010,2013 and 2015?

Some preferred criteria:
[ul]
[li]Easiest to support.[/li]
[li]Have a responsive unbloated IDE.[/li]
[li]Have a responsive unbloated run-time.[/li]
[li]Create small tools to full blown Oracle Databased solutions.[/li]
[li]Work on the most versions of Windows Desktop practical.[/li]
[/ul]

What can you suggest and most importantly why?


Thanks,

Michael42

 
It is bunch of conflicting requirements.

2015: Easiest to support - the version of .net can be configured to support all previous versions
2008: Responsive IDE - it was the last one from the VS2002 line. All the later ones are written in C# and are a lot slower (noticeable when you run on a low powered machine)
Don't know about unbloated runtime
Any one can be used to create small tools
2008, 2010: can work with all versions of windows from XP to W10.
2012, 2013, 2015 will only work from W7 onwards
 
xwb,

Thanks for the detailed response.

Code:
2015: Easiest to support

Could you please elaborate on that. I guess I am asking for a compelling reason to use that version over the others.

Thanks again,

Michael

 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor

Back
Top