Hi,
I need to determine which flavour of PIX 515 is needed for the following solution:
I will have either a 512K or 2MB leased line connection to the Internet - giving VPN access for 30 remote users (using terminal services apps,pop3 Email and file services).
In addition to this I need to provide HQ access for 5 other users (all in one remote office)... this access has to be secure and robust as the users will be using financial apps using terminal services often throughout the day.
The most important issue is that they have a constant connection to the HQ servers. Initially I had planned to give them a dedicated 128K point to point leased line from them to us - as this would be reliable, but expensive.
However, on the other hand, can I not just create a more reliable PIX solution... for example, if I was to use a fail-over PIX for assurance and also could I have a dialup ISDN line also terminating on the PIX again for added assurance should the main Internet connection go down.
Basically can I have:
- 2MB leased line terminating on a router which feeds into the PIX (the main access method)
- 128K ISDN line terminating on a separate router and feeding into another port on the PIX (backup)
- a failover PIX working alongside for further resilience
Plus, do I need to go for the unbundled s/w option. With 4 FE ports?
Thanks,
Marcus
I need to determine which flavour of PIX 515 is needed for the following solution:
I will have either a 512K or 2MB leased line connection to the Internet - giving VPN access for 30 remote users (using terminal services apps,pop3 Email and file services).
In addition to this I need to provide HQ access for 5 other users (all in one remote office)... this access has to be secure and robust as the users will be using financial apps using terminal services often throughout the day.
The most important issue is that they have a constant connection to the HQ servers. Initially I had planned to give them a dedicated 128K point to point leased line from them to us - as this would be reliable, but expensive.
However, on the other hand, can I not just create a more reliable PIX solution... for example, if I was to use a fail-over PIX for assurance and also could I have a dialup ISDN line also terminating on the PIX again for added assurance should the main Internet connection go down.
Basically can I have:
- 2MB leased line terminating on a router which feeds into the PIX (the main access method)
- 128K ISDN line terminating on a separate router and feeding into another port on the PIX (backup)
- a failover PIX working alongside for further resilience
Plus, do I need to go for the unbundled s/w option. With 4 FE ports?
Thanks,
Marcus