Which is faster the Thunderbird or regular Athalon

[gads12]

Which is faster the Thunderbird or regular Athalon and what are the cache size diffrences? [sig]<p> Glenn<br><a href=mailto: glenns@wtco.net> glenns@wtco.net</a><br><a href=

http://www.wtco.net/homepages/glenns>

Glenn & Jims Bass Fishing Site</a><br> [/sig]

 

[Karl Blessing]

um, Duh

Classic Slot A Athlon, Size doesnt make speed vary, Classic has OFFDIE! cache, which means it's slower, the special thing about TBird and Duron, is that they have On-Die cache, makes them faster, even if the Duron has only 64K cache, since it's On-die, it can almost match a regular Athlon, the TBird on the other hand surpases a Athlon Classic. [sig]<p>Karl<br><a href=mailto:kb244@kb244.com>kb244@kb244.com</a><br><a href=

http://kb244.com>

</a><br>Experienced in : C++(both VC++ and Borland),VB1(dos) thru VB6, Delphi 3 pro, HTML, Visual InterDev 6(ASP(WebProgramming/Vbscript)<br>

http://www.brainbench.com/transcript.jsp?pid=629151

[/sig]

 

[gads12]

Thanks for the info. [sig]<p> Glenn<br><a href=mailto: glenns@wtco.net> glenns@wtco.net</a><br><a href=

http://www.wtco.net/homepages/glenns>

Glenn & Jims Bass Fishing Site</a><br> [/sig]

 

[Karl Blessing]

sorry about the &quot;Uh Duh&quot; part, I sometimes forget not everyone has been exposed to the long Intel Vs AMD wars. [sig]<p>Karl<br><a href=mailto:kb244@kb244.com>kb244@kb244.com</a><br><a href=

http://kb244.com>

</a><br>Experienced in : C++(both VC++ and Borland),VB1(dos) thru VB6, Delphi 3 pro, HTML, Visual InterDev 6(ASP(WebProgramming/Vbscript)<br>

http://www.brainbench.com/transcript.jsp?pid=629151

[/sig]