TonyGroves
Programmer
I've heard that cpio is more tolerant than tar of tape data errors; if that's true, I'd like to use it for (single-volume) tape backups.
However, when using cpio, I have to decide on an output format; the default is Binary, but that produces annoying error messages about each file's inode number being truncated. Another option is tar format, but I wonder if I use that would I be back to square one as regards data error tolerance?
If anybody can shed any light on this, or provide any other helpful suggestions, it would be much appreciated.
Thanks.
However, when using cpio, I have to decide on an output format; the default is Binary, but that produces annoying error messages about each file's inode number being truncated. Another option is tar format, but I wonder if I use that would I be back to square one as regards data error tolerance?
If anybody can shed any light on this, or provide any other helpful suggestions, it would be much appreciated.
Thanks.