What do you all think about... 1

[DougP]

Either having two forums one for Win 2000 Server and one for Win 2000 Pro<br>Or re-naming this forum to use both.

 

[dgrewe]

I for one am going to stick with NT 4 and Win 98 for a while.&nbsp;&nbsp;Placing my trust in MicroSoft to produce a trust worthy product on the first release has been proven fatal on may occisions.&nbsp;&nbsp;I will not move until several updates have been released and I'm forced to. <br><br>Tek-Tips has several dual versions software forums I.E. <br>Novell 3.0 vers Novell 4.0<br>FoxPro Vers Visual FoxPro.<br><br>I vote for Separate NT / 2000 forums.<br> <p>David W. Grewe<br><a href=mailtoave@internationalbid.net>Dave@internationalbid.net</a><br><a href= > </a><br>

 

[carty]

I too vote for seperate forums please.<br><br>Ta

 

[pmkincaid]

There is actually a Win2000 Professional forum under &quot;Desktop Software&quot; and one in this group, &quot;MIS&quot; for Win2000 Server.<br><br>Paul

 

[Zelandakh]

Similarly, I'm one for sticking with NT both as a forum and for my network. Going 2000 across the board is a long way off and very costly for any SME with little benefit visually.<br><br>Let's wait until Win2000 SP3 (i.e. I'l review the situation next week)<br><br>

 

[APotter]

FWIW I'd rather keep NT and 2K as separate fora....<br><br>Alex

 

[MasterRacker]

I think the current arrangement: <br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;MIS&gt;NT4.0<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;MIS&gt;2000 Server<br><br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Desktop Software&gt;NT Workstation<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Desktop Software&gt;2000 Profressional<br><br>is fine the way it is.... <p> Jeff<br><a href=mailto: masterracker@hotmail.com> masterracker@hotmail.com</a><br><a href= > </a><br> Of all the things I've lost in life, I miss my mind the most ...