I found an article on MSDN that suggests running analyze switches in the following order provides good coverage:
analyze -v4 <database path>
analyze -f -v4 <database path>
analyze -f -c -v4 <database path>
If I know that there are errors that need to be corrected, is there any reason why I shouldn't run the analyze -f -v4 <database path> right away? And if I know I have "found a diff" and "found a comment" errors, is there any reason why I shouldn't run the analyze -f -c -v4 without running the previous two?
analyze -v4 <database path>
analyze -f -v4 <database path>
analyze -f -c -v4 <database path>
If I know that there are errors that need to be corrected, is there any reason why I shouldn't run the analyze -f -v4 <database path> right away? And if I know I have "found a diff" and "found a comment" errors, is there any reason why I shouldn't run the analyze -f -c -v4 without running the previous two?