Tek-Tips is the largest IT community on the Internet today!

Members share and learn making Tek-Tips Forums the best source of peer-reviewed technical information on the Internet!

  • Congratulations gkittelson on being selected by the Tek-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

VPN Negotiation problem

Status
Not open for further replies.

jet042

MIS
Dec 23, 2002
258
US
I have two SonicWall Pro 3060s that I'm trying to create a site-to-site VPN tunnel between. One (192.168.b.1) is running SonicOS Enhanced and the other (192.168.c.1) is running standard. The VPN is up and passing traffic and it seems to be very stable, but the logs are filling up with the following messages. They log 2 or 3 every minute and it's making it very difficult to check the logs for a real problem.

I've copied the relevant log entries in below. Both devices are behind NAT devices (subnets "a" and "d" below) that act as WAN aggregators, but that didn't give us any trouble before upgrading b.1 to enhanced. I've verified that both tunnels are set up correctly and have even destroyed and re-created the tunnels on both ends. Needless to say, SonicWall support has been no help.

Code:
09/10/2009 09:56:42.912	Warning	VPN IKE	Received notify. NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN	xxx.xxx.xxx.186, 500	192.168.d.xxx, 500		 
09/10/2009 09:56:42.912	Info	VPN IKE	IKE Initiator: Start Quick Mode (Phase 2).	192.168.d.xxx, 500	xxx.xxx.xxx.186, 500	VPN Policy: S2S-VPN

Code:
09/10/2009 09:57:30.048	IKE Responder: IPSec proposal does not match (Phase 2)	xxx.xxx.xxx.250	192.168.a.xxx	192.168.b.0/22 -> 192.168.c.0/24	 
09/10/2009 09:57:30.048	IKE Responder: No matching Phase 1 ID found for proposed remote network	xxx.xxx.xxx.250	192.168.a.xxx	192.168.b.0/22	 
09/10/2009 09:57:30.048	IKE Responder: Received Quick Mode Request (Phase 2)	xxx.xxx.xxx.250, 500	192.168.a.xxx, 500

 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor

Back
Top