We've been having a debate, which I'm wondering if anyone else has any views on. The crux of the argument is this:
Whether ot not the implementation of pseudo stack trace code (similar to that used in dot.net) into the VBA modules of library code, thus providing greater visibility as to what has been called, versus the additional risk that the introduction of an additional point of failure (new code modules to propogate the error back up to the original calling module), brings to the application.
Is it worth it? Aren't stack traces better suited to dot.net and classes? Would it save time debugging VBA apps?
Thoughts please.
Whether ot not the implementation of pseudo stack trace code (similar to that used in dot.net) into the VBA modules of library code, thus providing greater visibility as to what has been called, versus the additional risk that the introduction of an additional point of failure (new code modules to propogate the error back up to the original calling module), brings to the application.
Is it worth it? Aren't stack traces better suited to dot.net and classes? Would it save time debugging VBA apps?
Thoughts please.