I recently upgraded from Paradox 8 (actually Wordperfect Suite 8 Professional) to Paradox 10 (actually WordPerfect Office 2002 Professional). I now have too many problems with Paradox to count (not to mention all of the other applications). I've applied all the patches and hot fixes; I've re-installed a couple of times; I've gor it on three different boxes (running WinXPpro or Win2K). I'm pretty much convinced I've got a bad copy (which Corel won't replace), but I'm wondering if anybody else that's done the upgrade has this partial listing of problems on WinXPpro -
1. The position of the cursor has no relationship to where the next character will be inserted/deleted (it's not even cosistently off).
2. Code will not change the Working Directory (setWorkingDir and writeProfileString don't work).
3. Code won't change some properties of some UIObjects.
4. The field definitions in Forms and Reports are CHANGED whenever you try to modify a design document and then resave it.
5. Unbound text Fields (fixed width) are DELETED when code sets them to the empty string (luckily, for some reason you can change the "visible" property instead in this case).
Anybody out there having similar problems? Oh, in case you haven't guessed, I'd give version 10 a very big thumbs down.
The problems listed above seem to be common to my using version 10, no matter what version the document was originally designed in, whether or not it's delivered, and what version any bound tables were initially designed in.
1. The position of the cursor has no relationship to where the next character will be inserted/deleted (it's not even cosistently off).
2. Code will not change the Working Directory (setWorkingDir and writeProfileString don't work).
3. Code won't change some properties of some UIObjects.
4. The field definitions in Forms and Reports are CHANGED whenever you try to modify a design document and then resave it.
5. Unbound text Fields (fixed width) are DELETED when code sets them to the empty string (luckily, for some reason you can change the "visible" property instead in this case).
Anybody out there having similar problems? Oh, in case you haven't guessed, I'd give version 10 a very big thumbs down.
The problems listed above seem to be common to my using version 10, no matter what version the document was originally designed in, whether or not it's delivered, and what version any bound tables were initially designed in.